Posted on 04/03/2008 11:24:51 AM PDT by kingattax
Hillary Clinton’s chances of winning the Democratic presidential nomination are now anywhere from 5 per cent to 20 per cent. By rights she should be flat on her back, declared the loser by technical knockout. But not only is she standing; she is plunging ahead with a dogged ferocity.
In spite of Barack Obama’s clear advantage in the popular vote and committed delegate tallies – a mathematical dominance unlikely to be reversed even if he loses most of the remaining primary contests – Mrs Clinton says she is being bullied by the “big boys” and vows to stay in the race until the Democratic convention.
Her relentless campaign has inspired reporters variously to compare her, with a mixture of admiration and horror, to the Terminator, a zombie, a cyborg and Anton Chigurh, the malevolent killer in No Country for Old Men. Even the coughing spasms that have seized her with alarming frequency these past few months have become an emblem of her fortitude. After she muscled her way through a foreign policy address, The New Yorker praised her ability to “suppress the coughing through sheer will”.
So what makes Mrs Clinton run, even as her win-at-all-cost strategy threatens her party’s chances against John McCain, the Republican candidate? The answer lies partly in her innately combative nature, the quality that drew Bill Clinton to her when “she was in my face from the start”. She is equally famous for a preternatural focus and what one of her friends called her “tunnel vision”, along with a determination so unshakeable that her husband once told a visitor to the Oval Office: “I might as well try to lift that desk up and throw it through the window as to change her mind.” To reach her goals, she long ago learnt to embrace any tactic, however destructive. As her mother noted, Hillary does “everything she has to do to get along and get ahead”.
One of the most fascinating aspects of Mrs Clinton’s tall tale about dodging snipers at Tuzla airport in Bosnia was her unwillingness to acknowledge that she had described her supposed derring-do to at least four audiences. This was no slip of the tongue created by sleep deprivation, as she claimed. Her capacity for self-delusion is nothing new. During the 1992 campaign, when ABC’s Sam Donaldson played audio tapes of Gennifer Flowers, her husband’s lover, saying “Goodbye darling” and Mr Clinton replying “Goodbye baby”, her reaction was: “Oh, that’s not true.” “Didn’t happen?” Mr Donaldson pressed. “Of course not,” she replied.
For decades Mrs Clinton has thought of herself as a woman of destiny. Even as a little girl she would stand “in a patch of sunlight” pretending “there were heavenly movie cameras watching my every move”. She willingly served in her husband’s shadow, in spite of the humiliations he inflicted on her with his womanising, on the assumption she would have her turn.
Back in 1974, Mr Clinton said she “could be president one day” and Linda Bloodworth-Thomason, one of their close friends, often remarked that when the Clintons were “dead and gone, each of them is going to be buried next to a president of the United States”. Mrs Clinton’s private sense that she was entitled to the presidency has expanded to the idea that the public owes her this ultimate prize as well.
She also benefits from a kind of political voodoo that makes her seem invincible, even to usually clear-eyed analysts who do the delegate maths over and over and keep finding she loses. The Clintons’ narrow escapes from political extinction haunt their memories like tribal drums in the night: from the suicide of their close friend Vincent Foster to an endless parade of scandals. In response they have built a fearsome political machine that attacks enemies and cuts loose friends they believe have wronged them.
A vital piece of this mythology is that, with the exception of Mr Clinton’s second race for governor in 1980, the Clintons do not lose in politics. Running for office is what the “Billary” tag team does; it is the glue that binds them together– “in her DNA as much as his”, according to their old friend Tom Siebert. The duo have spent their adult lives perfecting the permanent campaign, mastering its dark arts even as they went about the everyday business of governing.
Mrs Clinton has made a point of saying: “There are no do-overs in life.” Yet she and her husband are seeking the ultimate do-over, another term or two in the Oval Office. Both are deeply invested in the sequel: Mrs Clinton is driven to fulfil her destiny, and Mr Clinton covets a chance to burnish his legacy and purify Clintonism.
But this time the dynamic is different, and therein lies the catch. To win in 2008, the Clintons have had to reverse their roles of Bill the candidate and Hillary his chief adviser and advocate. The demands of an unexpectedly tight campaign have brought out the worst in both of them, dragging their popularity ratings to new lows.
The virtuoso politician who feeds on the adulation of the rope-line suddenly finds himself playing an off-key second fiddle. The methodical, behind-the-scenes chief of staff finds herself centre stage, her flatlander voice betraying a harsh edge as she experiments with slogans and personalities.
Mrs Clinton’s political mettle had never been tested. Her opponent in her 2000 Senate race was a lightweight and she had token opposition in 2006. Her candidacy for president was based on the assumption that she would face a weak field and again coast to victory.
Perhaps what propels Mrs Clinton more than anything is a determination to prove she can be as good at politics as her husband, who she once said “makes it look so easy”. But months on the hustings have shown she lacks his legendary political talents.
In any other year, just being Hillary Clinton might have sufficed. But she is up against a man whose political gifts, ironically enough, are often compared with those of William Jefferson Clinton.
After reading ths, how much credit do I get for suppressing the barf through my sheer force of will?
WTF?
She had the first 301 game bowling. Take that Mr. Thrity-seven!
Well, that IS a realm she's familiar with.
The bulldyke beneath the make-up is peeping through.
These days, months on the hustings show that HE also lacks his legendary political talents.
14.9% Clinton
84.8% Obama
They apparently don't know Hillary very well.
That blue dress ribbon was probably for all the flying ash trays in the WH. I guess that could have been called a battle zone when they were there for eight years.
How’s that?
More than that. At some point she will overthrow him.
If Obama was in her position and she in his, would any Democrats be demanding that he concede?
It should be obvious that the Democrat leadership:
1. Wants Obama, regardless of the electoral consequences, so as to appease the monolithic black vote.
2. And wants the Clintons...gone. It took them sixteen years to recognize that this pair of grifters were corrupt beyond mention and not only dangerous for the country, but for their precious party.
What goes around, comes around...A__holes.
You know what occurred to me?
Bill may be on the hook with people expecting her to be pres. He may have gotten big bucks for his foundation and god knows what and those donors were buying something and it wasn’t his good will.
Bill may be up to his ears in IOU’s to people you don’t wanta owe favors to. That mayt explain his desperation.
I didn’t say Hillary was electable. She isn’t.
A score of 37 in bowling is exactly the type of score you get when you take your Brownies pack to the bowling lanes.
Obama bowls like a Brownie.
I agree with you.
Except I am not ready to proclaim Obama as 'evil', (unless you consider him evil for simply being a leftist) I believe him to be more: naive, idealistic, inexperienced, less shrewed, less cunning, more in a position to listen to other liberals and the occassional middle of the roader.
Hillary though has planned this since college and will let nothing stand in her way even a lying cheating scum of a husband. She also considers herself to be superior in intellect then everyone else (as do most liberals).
Simply put, Hillary is a liberal Satan portraying herself as a lamb.
If you believe her to be preferable over Obama, then I believe that her tactics and planning have worked to deceive you into believing that she is something she is not.
Her dream is this nation’s nightmare.
A few weeks ago Hillary was double digits above Hussein in PA.
16%-26% lead in various polls
Now her lead has shrunk to 2%-5% in most polls and one poll even has Hussein in the lead.
By the time the PA primary takes place, I think Hillary is going to lose and she’s going to lose big.
I am not happy about this. I wish she would win by a huge margin in PA and also take Indiana and NC and go on to end up with a higher popular vote total.
I’d like to see a real fight all the way to the convention floor. I’d love to see the stupor-delegates end up giving Hillary the nod, which would cause African Americans to bolt from the demonrat party in a big way.
Hillary would be SOOOOOOO easy to beat in November.
But it ain’t gonna happen. Hillary blew it. She blew her brains out with a sniper rifle. She coulda been a contender, but she’s toast.
Which is so much the worse for us. Now we’ve got to face a muzzie with a Messiah complex and hordes of extremely stupid voters (all educated by the NEA) who are willing to sell America down the river in the name of diversity.
I am worried about our nation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.