Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigerLikesRooster
...that the run that brought the lender to its knees was due to a lack of confidence and not because of a lack of capital or liquidity.

Apparently the lack of confidence started at the top. I've seen reports that Bear-Stearns execs sold 27 million shares of B-S stock for $2 billion in mid-February.

If Bear-Stearns did not have a lack of capital or liquidity, why hasn't any other outfit offered more than $10 per share for it?

10 posted on 04/03/2008 9:56:58 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DuncanWaring
If Bear-Stearns did not have a lack of capital or liquidity, why hasn't any other outfit offered more than $10 per share for it?

Indeed. The proof that the Fed did the right thing here is that of all the parties whining about how it was the wrong thing, not one is offering a higher bid to accompany the whine. Even while it was still at $2/share, there were no other bidders.

16 posted on 04/03/2008 10:15:32 AM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson