The facts are that a teenage girl was forced to strip in front of public officials and reveal her private parts to further a search for Advil.
Those are the facts.
Upon this fact I argue that the search was baseless. It was for advil.
It was unconstitutionally intrusive not even meeting the standard of "justified at the outset."
A baseless and unjustified forced exposure of genitals in any other venue is child molesting. I come by my view quite honestly and openly.
Tell us how your views of the facts and the conduct of these officials differs from mine. I want YOUR views, not a cut an paste of a legal opinion by the Court.
She wasn't touched, she wasn't nude and you're begging the question of the alleged "force".
Three strikes.