Is that what I said?
"So anyone can make a flimsy allegation and that is sufficient to search?"
Wow. You're not going to let the facts get in your way. We're done on this thread. You have no idea what you're talking about, and I don't have the time nor the inclination to educate you.
You are done. I am not. I will slam every incrementalist post you make, lest anyone be fooled by your slick abuse of logic.
Oh, I know EXACTLY what I am talking about. Like all usurpers, paulsen, it isn't what you say, but what you do NOT say.
You continually ignore the notion that there were plenty of reasons to doubt the veracity of the claim by the girl caught with Advils that Savana had Advils. That was the only evidence that Savana had done wrong.
You cite a court precedent where there was more evidence than just the claim of a student to justify a search where that was the only evidence.
You engage in the hysterical argument that if we allow renegade Advil to possibly exist in schools, well, crack smoking in the boys room is the logical endgame.
And then, like all modern usurpers on both the left and right, you trot out the claim that it's all for the children. Who can possibly argue with usurpation when its for the children? Never mind that the endgame of totalitarian drift is a nightmare for children and adults alike.
You make me sick. Again.