Wrong. ONE girl broke the rules. She claimed that the other supplied the drugs but none was found on her.
Clearly you not only think that the 4th Amendment is not worth toilet paper but that innocent until PROVED guilty is not a valid concept either>
Not only have you justified the atrocious treatment of a young girl, you've declared her guilty without the benefit of a trial with no evidence.
Do you always so favor the complete trashing of the basic freedoms and rights of the citizens of this country?
You think these public school children are entitled to fourth amendment protection? Wrong.
"Not only have you justified the atrocious treatment of a young girl, you've declared her guilty without the benefit of a trial with no evidence."
Correct. If I did this in court, you'd actually have a point. As it is, you've got bupkis.