Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
These girls broke them and are now trying to rewrite the rules.

Wrong. ONE girl broke the rules. She claimed that the other supplied the drugs but none was found on her.

Clearly you not only think that the 4th Amendment is not worth toilet paper but that innocent until PROVED guilty is not a valid concept either>

Not only have you justified the atrocious treatment of a young girl, you've declared her guilty without the benefit of a trial with no evidence.

Do you always so favor the complete trashing of the basic freedoms and rights of the citizens of this country?

261 posted on 04/03/2008 6:34:10 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies ]


To: metmom
"Clearly you not only think that the 4th Amendment is not worth toilet paper but that innocent until PROVED guilty is not a valid concept either>"

You think these public school children are entitled to fourth amendment protection? Wrong.

"Not only have you justified the atrocious treatment of a young girl, you've declared her guilty without the benefit of a trial with no evidence."

Correct. If I did this in court, you'd actually have a point. As it is, you've got bupkis.

343 posted on 04/04/2008 5:32:59 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson