Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AndyJackson
But the appropriate inquiry is whether a strip search was justified at its inception. See, e.g., Phaneuf v. Fraikin, 448 F.3d 591, 597-600 (2d Cir. 2006); Cornfield v. Consolidated High Sch. Dist., 991 F.2d 1316, 1321 (7th Cir. 1993).

Indeed, the Second Circuit recently held that violation of a school’s tobacco policy cannot be the basis of a strip search for another drug. Phaneuf, 448 F.3d at 599-600; see also Cornfield, 991 F.2d at 1321

Why does the court call it a strip search? There was no strip search. Doesn't this clown know how to read?

1,388 posted on 04/06/2008 9:54:51 PM PDT by TigersEye (robertpaulsen got the zot. ... Lost his cool, fell off the pot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1089 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye

Ping the gerbil!


1,390 posted on 04/06/2008 9:58:31 PM PDT by 50mm (1) Stomp on innocent's head. 2) Knock down door. 3) Apply for warrant. 4) Find probable cause.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1388 | View Replies ]

To: TigersEye

Nice tag!


1,392 posted on 04/06/2008 9:58:59 PM PDT by 50mm (1) Stomp on innocent's head. 2) Knock down door. 3) Apply for warrant. 4) Find probable cause.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1388 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson