And if they don't choose your standard, use the courts to force them. Nice bit of doublethink.
This is called rule of law. The same interpretation of the law everywhere is called equal protection. These are fundamental principles of our republic. Only you could turn protections against tyranny to be instruments of tyranny.
Furthermore, as I am sure Darren would point out, succinctly, this argument about states rights is moot. It is not an issue before this Court because Appellees have not made states rights an issue in this case. The question before the COA is the question of the application of Federal Standards to search and seizure to the facts of this case. No one has made the argument that those standards do not apply or that the Federal Courts do not have jurisdiction. That is the sole question that they can decide.