Posted on 04/02/2008 3:39:20 PM PDT by neverdem
looking at nude pubescent girls
I’ll add that to your list of fantasies.
You’re the feeb defending the perverts.
No, they don't. But when inventing facts is all you've got...
I've noted your fantasies. I haven't defended them.
And the little girl knew this how? Did anyone read her her rights? Did anyone call her parents? Or did they simply rush the kid into a backroom and ogle her crotch?
“I haven’t defended them.”
You’ve effectively defended these perverts all over this thread with the tone of your posts. Either the girl is wrong or the authorities were wrong. You haven’t been on the side of the child here, that is for damned sure.
She wasn't under arrest. Another fantasy?
From the facts set out in the actual decision:
Redding denied bringing pills to school, denied distributing pills to her classmates, and told Wilson that she did not mind being searched.
Of course, the facts aren't nearly as titillating as your imagination.
The tone?
Pesky old facts ruining your fantasies.
“She wasn’t under arrest. Another fantasy?”
Ever heard of the 4th amendment to the Constitution?
Ever hear of the Tenth Amendment?
You are the dumbest most illogical person I have seen post on this forum, and that is going some.
Nope, you keep trotting out the facts. We read the case, and know that facts. This girl was forcibly strip searched for Advil by school officials. Those are facts. Your fantasy is that this is all just peachy keen under the law.
The collective of freerpublicans here are fixing to gather up our pictforks, boil up some tar, collect some old feathers and go hunting two reprobate judges who are too dumb to protect our womenfolk from a bunch of dirty old authoritiarians and who are too stupid to understand there are certain things for which we really do have zero tolerance. Possession of Advil does not shock our conscience. Strip searching teenagers to look for said Advil does, however, shock our conscience and we are disgusted that we could have any man sitting on judgment of another human being who is not likewise shocked disgusted and horrified at this grotesque overreach of state power.
Those two judges should be praying that the en banc hearing correct their folly, and then they ought to ask forgiveness of this girl, and spend some time in quiet contemplation of their roles in the order of things.
You’re the one claiming that a loss isn’t a loss because the ACLU hopes that they might get it overturned.
The logic of the left.
The 10th amendment does not reverse the 4th amendment, idiot. The 4th withholds the power of unreasonable search and seizure from the states, and so the 10th does not grant that power.
There is a lot more than hope at work. They were granted leave to request and en banc review. That means that the Court decided that there were probable grounds for reversal, and it is the state that should be sweating bullets.
Redding denied bringing pills to school, denied distributing pills to her classmates, and told Wilson that she did not mind being searched.
Your personal fantasy:
This girl was forcibly strip searched
Maybe you can write a letter to Penthouse Forum.
Does it not shock your conscience that state authorities would ask a girl to strip so that they could look for Advil?
Dude, it's f#$&ing Advil!!! Jesus Christ.
The 4th Amendment didn't apply to the states, liberal. That was an act of judicial activism in 1949.
While you leftists dream of local public school being micro-managed by federal judges, even the haven't reached the point of demanding that student recieve rights statements outside of arrests.
The drugs weren't identified until later. You keep forgetting that. Very conveniently.
Among other drugs later identified. Not to mention razors and knives.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.