Skip to comments.
Are We on the Eve of the Next World War?
April 1, 2008
| Aleksandra Rebic
Posted on 04/01/2008 6:22:22 PM PDT by Ravnagora
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
To: John Williams
Chinas dumping of the dollar for euros and calling in those IOUsWhat IOUs? They own Treasury bonds the same as I do. They can't call them in until the date they are due.
21
posted on
04/01/2008 8:20:47 PM PDT
by
Straight Vermonter
(Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
To: Ravnagora
The opposing sides? West vs. East. Huh? Which "East," and which "West?" I presume you mean the Russians and Europe/NATO ... but what vital stake has either side got in Kosovo, and why would anybody go to war with over Kosovo's independence?
Answer: there is no vital stake for either side, and thus there's no casus belli in Kosovo.
22
posted on
04/01/2008 8:27:18 PM PDT
by
r9etb
To: DB
“It feels like a world war is coming. “
-
Yes indeed it does.
And we’re sending our factories as fast as we can, to China.
To: Ravnagora
Please. Serbia was no victim of War War 2. A bunch of thugs, the Black Hand, assinated their way into a getting a pliant Serb King and then tried to destroy the Austro-Hungarian Empire through additional murder.
Serbia could have prevented war by turning over those involved.
Russia, France and Serbia chose war.
24
posted on
04/01/2008 8:34:53 PM PDT
by
rmlew
(Grievance politics is a mental illness)
To: rmlew
25
posted on
04/01/2008 8:35:28 PM PDT
by
rmlew
(Grievance politics is a mental illness)
To: Ravnagora
I think the author misses a key point in terms of where "the game" is really being played between Washington, Brussels, Moscow, and Beijing.
More specifically, the the game that's being played out between these competing forces is the control of Central Asia.
That is, look at Uzbekistan (or Turkmenistan) and the natural resources that are associates with those countries (unlike Kosovo). Obviously, both China and Russia are chief stakeholders in this game as well as the US and the EU. - think about it.
To: AFPhys
Answer to title question: Yes.
South America — Chavez
Africa — several Islamic countries
Europe — Balkans, Russia and Muslim immigants
Southwest Asia — Pakistan to Syria
South Asia — India building a major Navy
China — building an even more major military
Korea — again.
And remember than Indonesia is Muslim.
North America — if SCOTUS rules against Heller...
27
posted on
04/01/2008 8:44:16 PM PDT
by
Solitar
("My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them." -- Barry Goldwater)
To: rmlew
Incorrect, Serbia capitulated to Austria’s demands but they still chose war. The assassination was a dog and pony show.
28
posted on
04/01/2008 8:59:43 PM PDT
by
montyspython
(Love that chicken from Popeye's)
To: rmlew
"Serbia was no victim of War War 2."
Have you ever heard of Jasenovac?
To: LjubivojeRadosavljevic
I believe his context was purely WWI.
30
posted on
04/01/2008 9:12:58 PM PDT
by
montyspython
(Love that chicken from Popeye's)
To: AFPhys
I agree. What we're seeing is a “dead cat bounce” after the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the triumph of (admittedly fascistic) capitalism in China. There will be bumps in the road caused by countries that no longer are important to the Cold War and that have some extra cash (Venezuela, Iran, et al), but most of the world, especially the larger countries, see that capitalism and democracy are the way to go, even those that seem resistant now. Most everyone here seems very worried about the Muslims in Europe or the leftists in South America or that little mutant in North Korea. Those are comparable to Cubans in Angola or Communists in Greece. We no longer have 20,000 nuclear warheads on the ready to launch in our direction, and those countries that seem to be a threat now would fold in a two-day real war if they ever started anything. The world is getting richer and richer, fewer people are starving or going to gulags, and everyone is online. The end of the world is a long ways away. Not saying that there might not be a couple of hits here and there, but our future's so bright, we've got to wear shades.
31
posted on
04/01/2008 9:16:45 PM PDT
by
VanShuyten
("Ah! but it was something to have at least a choice of nightmares.")
To: r9etb
Two oil pipelines are not vital?
32
posted on
04/01/2008 9:19:03 PM PDT
by
montyspython
(Love that chicken from Popeye's)
To: montyspython; rmlew
Yes, you're correct (i.e. WW 1 instead of WW 2) after review. I jumped the gun after the second sentence.
To: LjubivojeRadosavljevic
His conclusions are still incorrect however.
34
posted on
04/01/2008 9:35:29 PM PDT
by
montyspython
(Love that chicken from Popeye's)
To: Ravnagora
35
posted on
04/01/2008 9:40:17 PM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(su - | echo "All your " | chown -740 us ./base | kill -9 | cd / | rm -r | echo "belong to us")
To: r9etb
You don't make a convincing case for this. The conditions that caused WWI no longer exist. Kosovo may be of personal importance to you, but it is not the sort of stuff on which world wars are built. Disagree. We, the United States must treat any attack on the following nations as an attack on our own.
Belgium
Bulgaria
Canada
Czech Rep
Denmark
Estonia
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Netherlands
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
Do you think any war that breaks out in Serbia or Kosovo is not going to drag the USA into direct conflict with another world power?
36
posted on
04/01/2008 9:44:56 PM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(su - | echo "All your " | chown -740 us ./base | kill -9 | cd / | rm -r | echo "belong to us")
To: Centurion2000
Do you think any war that breaks out in Serbia or Kosovo is not going to drag the USA into direct conflict with another world power? No.
37
posted on
04/01/2008 10:00:32 PM PDT
by
r9etb
To: montyspython
Two oil pipelines are not vital? Not "vital" enough to fight a world war over, no.... Russia has no need for that oil. Europe can get the oil via different routes -- even from Russia.
Certainly they wouldn't be "vital" in the event of a war: they'd be destroyed!
38
posted on
04/01/2008 10:02:25 PM PDT
by
r9etb
To: Ravnagora
39
posted on
04/01/2008 10:42:25 PM PDT
by
F-117A
(Mr. Bush, have someone read UN Resolution 1244 to you!!!)
To: Ravnagora
"We need really stable, smart, and ethical people at the helm. We also need people willing to be strong and to do the right thing regardless of whatever the agendas may be"And we have NONE of those to chose from this election!
40
posted on
04/01/2008 10:49:05 PM PDT
by
Bokababe
( http://www.savekosovo.org)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson