[atlaw]

All that research would be replaced with a simple statement: “Superior intelligence created it.”

Pretty much sums up the entirety of intelligent design.

"Excuse me Dr. Smith, but this bacterial infection seems oddly resistant to previously effective drugs, have you noticed?"

"Must be a new bacterial strain."

"Where do you suppose it came from?"

"A superior intelligence created it."

"Oh. Ok. Wanna' play some golf?"

[gpk9]

Here is the correct way to say it:

"Excuse me Dr. Smith, but this condition we BELIEVE is caused by a 'bacterial infection' seems oddly resistant to previously effective drugs, have you noticed?"

"... bacterial infection ..."

Another theory similar to evolution. No demonstrable reproducible scientific proof whatsoever to support it. Said theory is right simply because THEY say it is right.

I've debated these people before. "How DARE you question what WE say!!!" is the only argument they can come up with.

Like evolution, this theory is also a huge money-maker, and like evolutionists, these people will do everything necessary to protect that money flow.

They don't care about facts, they don't care about science, and they absolutely don't want to know the true causes of illness. They avoid the subject at all cost. They won't go near it.

That is why I no longer debate them. I finally learned what people like Ben Stien have learned. Supporters of these theories care only about money and maintaining their lofty status.

You can't have a factual debate with arrogant money-motivated people who don't care about facts.