Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wku man

When police respond to an obvious party, they announce their presence, and kids begin pouring out of the house running away, they have probable cause to believe something criminal is in progress.
*****************************************************
Negative! they have cause to believe a party is in progress.. There is no note of anyone running away or behaving as if they were drunk... If anyone had left for their cars it would be to avoid having it towed which is what the police announced as their intention over their bullhorns,, you can’t cause a situation to occur and then use that situation to advance your illegal search...

Quit licking their boots.. They got them good... if their H.S. friends hadn’t been railroaded for being seen drinking out of a plastic cup (THE HORROR!) on the ASSUMPTION the cups held alcohol they wouldn’t have punk’d the cops... I’m just surprised no dogs were shot and no kids were tased.


31 posted on 03/29/2008 6:04:17 PM PDT by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Neidermeyer
Man are you gullible. There's not a judge in this land (not even in Florida) that wouldn't agree that a cop had probable cause to believe underage drinking was going on in those circumstances. When cops are called to a loud teenage or college party, I'd be willing to bet that 99 times out of 100 it's not a root beer party.

Let me guess...you're gonna try this same thing with your high school buddies now? Please do...I hope they stick you with the bill.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

48 posted on 03/29/2008 8:04:03 PM PDT by wku man (BLOAT while you can...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson