Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rarestia
[Police Chief from the story:] "If one kid had come there, even hadn't drank there, but had come there and had been drinking and had left and crashed and burned, then what would the sentiment be? Why didn't the police check everybody out?"

There could be drunks or crooks hiding anywhere the police go. I guess that means they need to conduct a full search and give everyone a sobriety test on every call, even if the police are just going to get an old lady's cat out of a tree. After all, there could have a been a drunk there that the police missed.

Never mind that whole 4th Amendment business, just make sure then police don't miss anything. < /s>

12 posted on 03/29/2008 5:07:26 PM PDT by timm22 (Think critically)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: timm22
It's about probable cause. When police respond to an obvious party, they announce their presence, and kids begin pouring out of the house running away, they have probable cause to believe something criminal is in progress. If they don't go in an determine what's going on, and investigate to see if a crime(s) has taken place, they're not doing their jobs.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

20 posted on 03/29/2008 5:28:36 PM PDT by wku man (BLOAT while you can...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson