Posted on 03/28/2008 9:59:13 AM PDT by a real Sheila
for later
why isn’t this part of a US strategy?
Tell the OPEC countries to clean the gutters of terrorists or we will simply stop buying their oil.
BFL
Not an issue. This formation does not require heat for producing the oil. It does require modern drilling techniques that are now being used. Read more at the link:
Technology-Based Oil and Natural Gas Plays:
Shale Shock! Could There Be Billions in the Bakken?
http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/ftproot/features/ngshock.pdf
Who said this was cheap? It takes significant horizontal drilling and fracturing, and the completions are not simple.
“There is oil there but how much will require a new seismic survey with the latest technology to determine how extensively distributed the oil is.”
I worked for a company in Houston that sold survey maps for oil deposits that were small, hard to get to etc... there is a lot of oil and gas out there. It’s just expensive to get. Plus, a lot of it is under private lands. Now that gas and oil are up there in price- more and more smaller companies will be out drilling and looking.
and the speckled pecker chipmunk
I’ve always thought that ultimately the government does what the HELL it wants, especially when matters of money and national security are involved. The government has so often done as it pleases when it comes to taking away folks land and property to use for “the greater good.” Why the heck can’t this land be explored and drilled regardless of the “greenie weenies?”
let them use up their oil first.
Green River Basin or something like that??
What would be a normal development curve for a field like this, assuming all goes well and median projections are accurate?
This is a different type of production than the Green River Basin in Wyoming, Utah, and Colorado. I’m not aware of Clinton ownership of any of it. Most of it is on Federally owned land.
Yes, it might be that large. Comparable to the oil shale in Colorado at 400 billion barrels. Get at it cheaply? That’s a different question.
Son has a place in Texas where they have found natural gas in the area and the landowners are negotiating.
Time frame you mean? Some of it is already in production. The area is constricted by pipeline and refinery capacity. Much of the Canadian oil we import is transported along the same corridor. There are many pipeline projects ongoing to expand them.
“Something like creating a preserve in Utah so we had to buy fron his pal Riadi in Indonesia?”
Exactly..
—Well let’s not drill it just yet. They’re willing to sell their oil, so let’s keep using up their supply. When they’re plumb dry, then we can start drilling ours - and decide whether to sell any to our enemies. —
But as long as we import oil from “Ragastan”, we have to defend the Middle East and our supply lines, and this also pi$$es off the friendly natives their in the process, increasing the risk of terrorism (hidden costs of foreign energy supplies). If we were energy independent we could tell the Middle East to bugger off.
Production of the Bakken Formation of the Williston Basin is very different from the Colorado Green River Basin. This is 41° API, no heat required to release it.
We must save it for the future when we won’t even need it.
NO DRILLING IN:insert state or area that the Evil Bush administration wants to drill in.
An American company was looking into developing that undersea field, which, the story said, could dwarf the Saudi oil fields. That story also mentioned that this area was just outside what the Russians claim as THEIR territory, even though that is technically in International waters too. Heh, tuffski.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.