Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MEGoody

>.As I said, they trusted the ad had been vetted by the operators of Craig’s list.<<

What statement by CL are they “trusting”? CL is plasered with warnings that the ads are NOT vetted by CL. That is why it is free. I like it that way.

It is vetted by the reader of the ad contacting the creator of the ad. Until then it is not to be respected as anything other than fiction. It is pretty obvious to anyone that actually reads the warnings on the site.

Any reasonable and responsible person, that is.


180 posted on 03/24/2008 3:31:52 PM PDT by RobRoy (I'm confused. I mean, I THINK I am, but I'm not sure. But I could be wrong about that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]


To: RobRoy
What statement by CL are they “trusting”?

The trust is implicit. Well, maybe not for you. Maybe you often respond to ads on sites you cannot trust. But most people aren't like that.

I like it that way.

Well, goodie for you. Doesn't change the fact that they make money off the website. If you want to prosecute someone besides the guy who posted the ad, go after the operators of the site, not the people who fell for the scam.

213 posted on 03/25/2008 7:09:55 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson