Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen

“So, with a wink and nudge, the fix is in. It will be declared an individual right that may be reasonably regulated or, as Justice Stevens opined, “It shall not be unreasonably infringed”.

I think that is what the final decision will say. It really wont change or settle anything.


48 posted on 03/19/2008 8:54:08 AM PDT by Hacklehead (Crush the liberals, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentation of the hippies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Hacklehead
When the DC Circuit Court declared the right to be an individual right, that was OK. When they declared the right to be fundamental, they went a bridge too far. A law infringing on a fundamental right would trigger strict scrutiny and the DC law probably would not stand.

I believe the U.S. Supreme Court took the case solely to strike down the declaration of a fundamental right.

53 posted on 03/19/2008 9:11:11 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson