Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DaveLoneRanger
I believe, as someone advocating the removal of the current system that is pretty effective in filtering the “unknown” nut jobs out, wouldn’t the impetus would be on YOU to offer an alternative?

Gosh, what did people do from 1787 to 1968? I'm sure the country must have been bloodbath all during that time.

For some reason, a lot of liberals (and apparently you) seem to think that there are zillions of people out there who would be extreme menaces to society if they were allowed to buy weapons, but perfectly harmless otherwise. I guess I don't see it. Why would someone be too dangerous to trust with a gun, but not too dangerous to trust with a car? Or with matches and gasoline? Or any other dangerous objects or substances?

422 posted on 03/18/2008 4:10:52 PM PDT by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 411 | View Replies ]


To: supercat
“Why would someone be too dangerous to trust with a gun, but not too dangerous to trust with a car? Or with matches and gasoline? Or any other dangerous objects or substances?”

Valid point. ANY object can become a weapon in the hands of someone desperate enough to use it. Including, for example, a newspaper, pen, or rusty tin can lid.

A weapon is an object for applying force. That happens to also be a definition for many tools. For example, I conk you on the head with a 15” Crescent Wrench, you ARE going down. Unless I'm particularly gentle in doing it, you won't be getting back up, either.

474 posted on 03/18/2008 6:55:51 PM PDT by Old Student (We have a name for the people who think indiscriminate killing is fine. They're called "The Bad Guys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson