Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DeLaine

If you wander up the thread, you will see I agree with you.

I’m saying the rule is not absurd. The punishment was absurd.

If you are saying that as a parent I have no right to have the school enforce a policy of not allowing students to sell food items to my child, I disagree with you. I might not support such a rule myself, but it is a rational way to give parents control over the raising of their children.

As I said before, the child could bring all the skittles to school he wanted. He was just not allowed to BUY them from another student.

The kid said he didn’t know the rule. It didn’t sound like the kid was OBJECTING to the rule. The other kid seemed to know the rule, and seemed to have a business selling contraband. But since he was let off, maybe that was a misperception from the original article.

This reminds me of the South Park episode where Eric Cartman is sent to a fat camp and smuggles in candy to sell to the other kids. He makes lots of money, and angry parents come to shut down the camp because it obviously “isn’t working”.

Anyway, by High School kids should be able to start thinking for themselves, so I wouldn’t push this kind of rule at that grade level. But elementary and middle school, I think this is a GOOD policy, so long as the punishment is not overblown.


90 posted on 03/14/2008 6:51:25 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT
He was just not allowed to BUY them from another student.

That would be Capitalism. That's EEEEEVIL!...

91 posted on 03/14/2008 8:19:22 AM PDT by null and void (It's 3 AM, do you know where Hillary is? Does she know where Bill is? Does Bill know what 'is' is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson