Skip to comments.
Grand Canyon much older than previously thought
Reuters ^
| Thu Mar 6, 2008
| Will Dunham
Posted on 03/07/2008 12:18:12 PM PST by rosenfan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 last
To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
Be it a mere six million years, or 17 million years, the big question is, how could this be done here, but nowhere else? There's more mystery here than the article lets on...
81
posted on
03/07/2008 8:22:06 PM PST
by
GOPJ
(A baby can't say Chinese additives makes the formula taste “funny” or drops poisonous.)
To: Amendment10
greatly throws off not only scientist's understanding of the timeline evolution of animals that have lived there, which includes the dating of fossils discovered there,No it doesn't. The rocks, with their fossils, were already there before the river started cutting the canyon. The revised date for the CANYON age makes no difference to the fossil dating whatsoever.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson