Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gandalftb
Well, I've used them both extensively. If I wanted to fight sometimes and still be able to dig latrines, I'd take the AK. If I want to fight all the time, have an E-tool, and want to shoot accurately to 400 yards and don't mind cleaning my weapon, I go with the M-16.

LOL, well stated.

There is a stalwart contingent of M16 haters on FR, but they're generally cordial.

The Kalashnikov is a remarkable fighting rifle, but it's not optimized for well trained, disciplined armies.

After over forty years, the M16 series has cemented its place as the most versatile, flexible, reliable and lethal individual weapons system in recent history.

33 posted on 03/06/2008 10:54:39 AM PST by xsrdx (Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: xsrdx

Agreed the AK-47 is not the best choice for a well trained army it;is however an utterly reliable weapon if given even the most rudimentary of care, ie cleaning/oiling stored in a clean dry place .

If western civilization has a melt down the rifle I would first grad would one of the many AK variants.


86 posted on 03/06/2008 1:04:08 PM PST by Nebr FAL owner (.308 reach out & thump someone .50 cal.Browning Machine gun reach out & crush someone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson