To: Kerretarded
“Nice try, feline. Please, in your infinite, omniscient wisdom, tell us how Rush has messed up on his strategy.”
I covered it somewhere between posts 1-300, knock yourself out...then your friends resorted to name calling invective, which I responded to.
598 posted on
03/05/2008 11:54:00 AM PST by
rbmillerjr
("bigger government means constricting freedom"....................RWR)
To: Kerretarded
Gotta love when trolls answer a question with “you look it up”. LOL!!!
Mark of low character.
608 posted on
03/05/2008 11:56:54 AM PST by
Clint N. Suhks
(Who would you rather appoint lifetime judges, Barack Hussein Obama or McQueeg?©®™)
To: rbmillerjr
I covered it somewhere between posts 1-300, knock yourself out...then your friends resorted to name calling invective, which I responded to.
Actually, you didn't. I looked. You just went on and on about how stupid and idiotic his strategy is but you never actually talked about why. The libs are going to be the libs. Hillary was NOT going to drop out, even if she lost big yesterday. The only thing that Rush's strategy did was make things a little more interesting on the Dem side. If you listened to all of the soundbites, all of the Dem pundits are ticked off that we have our nominee and they do not. They are now begging that this thing gets settled soon, once again not trusting their voters.
655 posted on
03/05/2008 12:22:58 PM PST by
Eagle of Liberty
(Ownership, Individuality, Freedom, Responsibility - The Backbone of Conservatism)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson