Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bogeygolfer

Obama does not have the numbers to secure the nomination without the Supers either. Carville’s outburst a few weeks ago that Hillary had to win both Ohio and Texas was a calculated setup. He’s a political snake. Slick repeated the same thing about a week ago. With a win in both they have traction to spin the comeback and gain momentum. The whores in the media will blindly jump on board. It’s not about absolute math. This is Democrat politics.


296 posted on 03/04/2008 4:49:58 PM PST by info_scout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies ]


To: info_scout

That’s the beauty of it. I don’t see any possible negative repercussions to this at all. First I think Hillary would be the easier candidate to beat. Second I think she’d be a better President than Obama. Third is that in any situation this conflict can only help (unless you prefer Obama). I hope this is close to the end and it does come down to the supers. The single thing they are afraid of most is the supers overriding the people and that is the single thing I want the most, regardless of which candidate emerges on top. Obama is dangerous on many levels. I do not see a way where the party faithful allow the supers to override the people, as much as that would bring joy to my heart.


335 posted on 03/04/2008 4:58:51 PM PST by Bogeygolfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson