Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Azerbaijan may use force in Karabakh after Kosovo
Reuters ^ | Mar 4, 2008 | Lada Yevgrashina

Posted on 03/04/2008 10:53:37 AM PST by Tailgunner Joe

BAKU, March 4 (Reuters) - Azerbaijan's president said on Tuesday his country was ready to take back breakaway Nagorno-Karabakh by force if need be and was buying military equipment and arms in preparation.

President Ilham Aliyev linked his comments to the newly-declared independence in Kosovo which he said had emboldened ethnic Armenian separatists in Nagorno-Karabakh.

In a sign of disapproval of Kosovo's independence Azerbaijan's parliament later voted to withdraw a 33-strong Azeri peacekeeping team that has been serving there under NATO command since 1999.

Former Soviet Azerbaijan has been trying to restore control over Nagorno-Karabakh, where ethnic Armenian separatists threw off Azeri rule in the 1990s in a war that killed about 35,000 people.

"We have been buying military machinery, airplanes and ammunition to be ready to liberate the occupied territories, and we are ready to do this," Turan quoted Aliyev as saying.

He added the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict with neighbouring Armenia could be resolved only on the principle of Azerbaijan's territorial integrity.

The fragile peace between Azerbaijan and Armenia has held thanks to a ceasefire announced in May 1994 whan large-scale hostilities ended.

But as Aliyev spoke, local television channels reported that two Azeri soldiers died in an exchange of fire near Nagorno-Karabakh's border earlier on Tuesday.

Armenian Prime Minister Serzh Sarksyan, who will become the next president after winning a Feb. 19 election, blamed Azeri soldiers for attacking Armenian forces but said he hoped for a peaceful solution to the stand-off.

"I'm full of hope that normal and civilised logic will prevail in the end," he told reporters in the Armenian capital.

"The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict will be solved by peaceful means and I rule out a military solution to this conflict."

"ILLEGAL" PRECEDENT

After mainly ethnic Albanian Kosovo declared independence from Serbia last month, Nagorno-Karabakh said this would help its own drive for international recognition.

The United States, major European Union powers and Azerbaijan's close ally Turkey have all backed Kosovo's independence, but Baku views it as illegal.

"You see how norms of international law are violated in the world," Aliyev was quoted as saying.

"And this has a negative impact on the settlement of the (Nagorno-Karabakh) conflict. The force factor remains decisive, and we will achieve this (Nagorno-Karabakh's reintegration)."

An Azeri official acknowledged that the pull-out of peacekeepers had clear political overtones due "to the changed political situation" after Kosovo's independence.

Azerbaijan's economy, propelled by windfall revenues from booming Caspian Sea oil exports, has shown double-digit growth, and Aliyev said the nation's $1.3 billion military budget was set to expand further in the years to come.

Aliyev said he believed Azerbaijan's growing military could nudge talks towards a diplomatic breakthrough. "A time will come when the Armenians will agree to that (settlement)," he said.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: armenia; azerbaijan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 03/04/2008 10:53:38 AM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Armenia/Azerbaijan: Deadly Fighting Erupts In Nagorno-Karabakh - March 4, 2008 - Officials in Armenia and Azerbaijan have confirmed an outbreak of military clashes in two regions of the disputed territory of Nagorno-Karabakh. Officials on both side confirmed multiple casualties, including two Azerbaijani soldiers killed. At least one side said clashes were continuing. The fighting appeared to be the most serious violation in years of the cease-fire agreement between Baku and Yerevan over the territory, which is dominated by ethnic Armenians and located within Azerbaijan. The mood in Armenia was already tense, with a 20-day state of emergency declared in response to opposition-led protests over a presidential election in mid-February. Skirmishes broke out in two separate districts of northwest Karabakh, with gunfire and shelling reported in three villages in the Terter and Goranboy regions. Armenian and Azerbaijani officials have each blamed the opposing side for initiating the clashes amid conflicting reports about how they began. Armenian Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian told RFE/RL's Armenian Service that Azerbaijani forces were responsible for initiating a "serious challenge to Armenian forces" and suggested more substantial military hardware was involved than had been in any previous violations of the 1994 cease-fire agreement that brought an end to major hostilities over Nagorno-Karabakh. Oskanian accused Baku of striking at a moment when Yerevan is particularly vulnerable, with the state of emergency in place since government troops and police forcibly dispersed opposition protesters in clashes on March 1 that left at least eight people dead. "We condemn this challenge, and we think that this is an attempt by the Azerbaijani side to exploit the current situation in Armenia," Oskanian said. "Perhaps they thought we had focused all of our attention on our internal situation, and that this could provide them with a psychological advantage, but this hasn't proved the case."
2 posted on 03/04/2008 10:56:47 AM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Yeah, the great diplomacy of the Sink Emperor. Left the region in a mess and when it erupts again, the MSM will blame Bush.

By the way, did those troops get home by Christmas last year, or what Christmas did the Rapist have in mind ???


3 posted on 03/04/2008 10:57:50 AM PST by Beatthedrum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

They are Christians trying to get free from Muslims.

So there will be no outcry.


4 posted on 03/04/2008 11:02:57 AM PST by NoLibZone (Duncan Hunter- The very Govts unwilling to support us in the WOT got the Fuel Tanker Deal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Here, like Kosovo, is another conflict where the U.S. favors the Islamic radicals over the Christians. It has something to do with the path for a Halliburton oil pipeline construction project.


5 posted on 03/04/2008 11:57:06 AM PST by shuckmaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kronos77; Bokababe; DTA; F-117A

ping


6 posted on 03/04/2008 12:02:55 PM PST by joan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: shuckmaster
It has something to do with the path for a Halliburton oil pipeline construction project.

Yawn.

Thanks for the Code Pink/MoveOn.org/DailyKos/International A.N.S.W.E.R. propaganda.

7 posted on 03/04/2008 12:06:15 PM PST by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: shuckmaster

How do you figure that? Kosovo independence was opposed by the muslims in this case and advances the cause of the Christian Armenians. Armenia is on NATO’s side and has peacekeepers in Kosovo. Muslim Azerbaijan is on Russia and Serbia’s side in this case and has pulled its troops out of Kosovo.


8 posted on 03/04/2008 12:07:39 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

The muzzies in Azerbaijan oppose the Kosovo independence because it fuels the call for independence in Christian/Jewish Nagorno-Karabakh.


9 posted on 03/04/2008 12:13:12 PM PST by shuckmaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

For all the propaganda about muslims supporting Kosovo, as it turns out only 3 muslim countries have recognized their independence. Most of the muslim countries in the world have sided with Russia.


10 posted on 03/04/2008 12:14:35 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: shuckmaster

Right. So in this case we are on the side of the Christians and the muslims are against us. Just the opposite of what you said.


11 posted on 03/04/2008 12:15:36 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
For those who compare Nagorno-Karabakh to Kosovo, N-K has a population of about 125,000 and it is an enclave entirely circled by Azerbaijan.
12 posted on 03/04/2008 12:16:49 PM PST by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Are you saying the U.S. backs the breakaway of Christian Nagorno-Karabakh? Where are you getting your news?


13 posted on 03/04/2008 12:18:29 PM PST by shuckmaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: shuckmaster

NATO has demanded Russian withdrawal from Transnistria, Abkhazia and South Ossetia, but not Nagorno-Karabakh.


14 posted on 03/04/2008 12:28:06 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: shuckmaster; Tailgunner Joe
The President has not sided for or against N-K.

He has stated that there should be a peaceful settlement to the differences between Armenia and Azerbaijan over N-K.

This is also a situation that Armenia has exacerbated.

15 posted on 03/04/2008 12:34:43 PM PST by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Perhaps that’s because they a good chance of Armenia eventually becoming part of NATO.


16 posted on 03/04/2008 12:34:51 PM PST by joan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
The ironic thing is that the Azerbaijanis are theorized by many to be related to the Albanians. In maps of over a 1,000 years ago there is an "Albania" mainly where Azerbaijan is today.

Additionally the war between Armenians and Azeris left approximately 800,000 Azeris and 400,000 Armenians ethnically cleansed (according to Wikipedia), which is greater than what happened temporarily during the Kosovo war.

The outflow of Albanians happened only after NATO attacks and during the most intense phase of the fighting and the Albanians returned after the NATO bombs stopped.

So when it comes to long-standing genuine ethnic cleansing (where people still can't return to their homes years after the skirmishes) Armenia and Azerbaijan far outdo Kosovo. Yet given the comparative media attention it's as if nothing much happened between them.

This only shows how heavy, persistent media attention combined with heavy U.S./NATO meddling make a situation exist in the minds of the western public while other similar or worse situations are practically non-existent to those same minds.

17 posted on 03/04/2008 12:36:20 PM PST by joan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
One possible solution:

“Goble-2” suggested exchanging the southern part of Armenia (the Region of Megri) with the western part of Nakhichevan autonomy, where it has a 9-km border with Turkey. At the same time Nagorno-Karabakh, together with the Lachin Corridor become a part of Armenia, or get independence; the blockade of the Armenia-Turkish border is abolished, the problem of non-enclave existence of Nakhichev Autonomy of Azerbaijan is solved, the border between Armenia and Iran are preserved, and is only moved to north, which has a key geopolitical significance: in this case when being passed to Armenia, the part of Nakhichevan Autonomy doesn’t allow any joining with Turkey and Azerbaijan. - LINK
Of course the current president of Armenia is from Nagorno-Karabakh and apparently opposes any land swap.
18 posted on 03/04/2008 12:49:33 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: shuckmaster
The Christians make up the majority that’s why. If they made up the minority you can bet your boots that Muslims would be looking to separate and join with Azb.
19 posted on 03/04/2008 12:53:28 PM PST by SQUID
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

So what?


20 posted on 03/04/2008 12:54:17 PM PST by SQUID
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson