Posted on 03/03/2008 10:58:19 AM PST by neverdem
Dicks vows to block bid to lift ban on loaded weapons in national parks WASHINGTON – With a showdown looming, U.S. Rep. Norm Dicks says he’s prepared to block any effort by the administration to lift the current ban on carrying loaded weapons in national parks. It’s not an idle threat.
As chairman of the House Appropriations interior subcommittee, Dicks oversees the National Parks Service’s annual budget and is in a position to prevent the administration from dropping the Reagan-era ban. While the Washington Democrat is usually reluctant to add legislative provisions to his spending bill, he is ready to make an exception in this case even if it prompts a presidential veto.
“Every now and then something rises up that needs to be fought and this is one of them,” Dicks said.
The ban, and efforts by the National Rifle Association to lift it, has emerged as a major Second Amendment issue in this election year. Democrats say Republicans are using it as a “wedge” to exploit gun issues in an already heated political atmosphere. Republicans say they are just trying to protect the rights of gun owners.
The dispute already has interrupted consideration of a massive public lands bill in the Senate, which included the creation of the 100,000-acre Wild Sky Wilderness area north of Seattle.
Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne has said the ban is under review and a new regulation will be released April 30 that will update firearms policies in the national parks and wildlife refuges.
Current regulations ban loaded weapons in the federal parks and refuges. Unloaded weapons can be carried if they are locked in a safe place such as a car trunk.
Dicks said his counterpart in the Senate, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., has told him she would use her position as chairman of the Senate Appropriations interior subcommittee to also block any changes in the current regulations.
“Permitting loaded firearms to be carried or used within our national parks or wildlife refuges would be a radical, unprecedented change that would likely upset the delicate balance that exists between wildlife and park visitors in these areas,” Dicks and Feinstein said in a letter to Kempthorne.
“More importantly,” the letter continued, “allowing loaded and accessible weapons in national parks would create a dangerous environment for millions of American families who annually visit our national parks expecting a safe and enjoyable experience – not loaded firearms and stray bullets.”
Dicks was an early supporter of efforts to ban handguns and assault weapons, in part because of the violence that so long flared in the Hilltop area of Tacoma.
“Everyone knows when you have guns, bad things happen,” Dicks said in an interview.
Dicks called the effort to lift the ban on loaded weapons in the parks a mistake and vowed to “fight it all the way. If this ban was good enough for the Reagan administration and James Watt, why isn’t it good enough now?”
Watt was President Reagan’s controversial interior secretary when regulations involving guns in the parks were last revised. The ban actually dates to 1936 amid concerns of illegal hunting and poaching in the parks.
Washington state’s two senators also oppose any change in the current regulations.
“Park rangers and conservationists have pointed to the reasonable gun regulations in our national parks as a reason they are some of the safest places in America,” said Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash.
Murray was also upset the issue had interfered with passages of the Wild Sky Wilderness legislation, which was yanked from the floor when Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., a longtime gun-rights advocate, said he would offer an amendment to the public lands bill lifting the ban.
“A bill creating new wilderness land for future generations shouldn’t be the grounds for ideological battles to be waged,” Murray said.
Democrat U.S. Rep. Adam Smith and Republican U.S. Rep. Dave Reichert have yet to take a stand, though Reichert, a former King County sheriff, is talking with former park rangers.
A retired park rangers association and the National Parks Conservation Association adamantly oppose any change in the current regulations.
“It’s truly unfortunate the National Rifle Association has chosen this issue to flex its election-year political muscle,” said Tom Kiernan, president of the National Parks Conservation Association.
The NRA fired back.
“Law abiding citizens should not be prohibited from protecting themselves and their families while enjoying America’s national parks and wildlife refuges,” said Chris Cox, the NRA’s chief lobbyist. “Under this proposal, federal parks and wildlife refuges will mirror the state firearms laws for state parks. This is an important step in the right direction.”
Les Blumenthal: 202-383-0008 lblumenthal@mcclatchydc.com
Rep. Dicks’ name is an example of truth in labeling if I’ve ever seen one.
ping...
What a Dicks!
So hikers and park visitors can’t protect themselves from the Federal Government programs that bring back (re-introduced) wolves and grizzle bears? What is wrong with this picture?
Will he have opposition this year by someone who respects 2nd Amendment freedoms?
This issue will be the gift that keeps on giving. One of two things can happen and they are both good.
1. We get the ban lifted and Americans get more of the constitutional rights back.
2. The ban does not get lifted and its prevented by a democrat. Benefitting Republicans running for Congress everywhere and hopefully Obama gets questioned about it during debates.
I guess the Capitol Police and others who guard your worthless ass everday, don't need guns either, huh asshole?
What a jerk! National Parks are not the big city. Folks have been carrying in National Forests for decades without bullets flying.
I’m guessing this guy has never fired a single round in his life.
Don’t worry Mr DICKs. I would never use my firearm to save your life.
“Donkeys v. Donkeys, this can’t hurt.”
Agree for sure.
I have noticed that the Dem’s have been laying low this time around on the gun issue. I suspect that their objective is to sneak this issue by any pro-gun voters who may be considering voting democrat. Then, once they have their chosen POTUS in office, and with control of both houses, watch out. The anti-gun bills will be flying off the shelves. Also, we will see a much emboldened ATF, more Ruby Ridge kind of incidents, etc...
Dear Rep Dicks,
Please quit dicking me. I am a law abiding, duly CCW permitted American citizen who carries.
To get to our dental appointments, among other things, my choices are to illegally drive through Wind Cave National Park; or, stop at the (non-guarded) entrance on US HWY 385 and unload & stow my weapon, and drive to the opposite side of the park & retrieve,reload, and reholster; or detour around the Park, adding approximately 20 extra miles of driving each way...and repeat for the return.
Again, Rep Dicks, please quit dicking me!
“Norm Dicks”?? I wouldn’t show my face, much less attack American’s Constitutional rights.
That is another drive-through on both US & State Routes; park & visit are just optional.
Same for Grand Teton, in Wyoming, where I enjoy reciprocity for my permit; some with parks in Utah and other states that are drive-through rather than a destination.
The sheer idiocy of this guy is stunning, even for a Dem. The simple fact is that there are threats to life and limb in the national parks, from both 2-legged and 4-legged creatures. To deny the right to self-defense to those who have already been licensed to carry and gone through background checks and classes is absurd - if they cannot be trusted by the government, then the government itself cannot be trusted.
I hope that this guy has effective opposition, and that the NRA and other pro-gun organizations make sure that his opponent in November is well-funded.
It really boggles the mind that anyone is this amazingly stupid -- not just these two libdolts, but the libdolts who vote for them...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.