Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Renfield; EarthBound

Actually, you are exactly right. Drudge only made his statements after the MoD released said information.

Likely they wanted to draw positive attention to their hero while at the same time pulling him back to safety after a short tour.

Drudge simply nibbled and they make a pre-made statement about “leaks” to hide their motives. And it also allows them to pull him back publicly. For them win-win, for us... well, casualties of war I guess.


9 posted on 02/29/2008 5:04:36 AM PST by MacDorcha (Arm yourself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: MacDorcha
Actually, you are exactly right. Drudge only made his statements after the MoD released said information.

The story had appeared on two other small outlets a few weeks ago apparently. Didn't get any legs until it appeared on Drudge. Was that due to the press respecting the embargo? If so, then I'm wondering who leaked to Drudge and why the timing? Seems to me the real story is who wanted Harry out, when and why.

19 posted on 02/29/2008 5:10:25 AM PST by mewzilla (In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson