Any law abiding citizen of the United States of America should be able to own firearms (provided they do not have any convictions for a violent crime). My original comment was poorly thought out.
Works for me, take care.
I would suggest that a man who is too dangerous to be allowed to own a gun, is too dangerous to be loose on the streets. If we're saying that allowing Joe to own a gun would present a risk to the community, wouldn't the community be served by Joes continued absence?
Any law abiding citizen of the United States of America should be able to own firearms (provided they do not have any convictions for a violent crime). My original comment was poorly thought out.
A person can be convicted of a violent crime for protecting his family in the eyes of the politicians in some states. Could you clarify?
Also If a person or group stood up against government anywhere in the U.S. Would this person or group be considered criminals? How does that fit with your summation?