[Psycho_Bunny]

No...he's trying to be clever by using classical dialectics to draw you to a pre-determined, un-provable conclusion.

To steal a line from Dennis Miller, "I can see through this guy like a used bar of Neutrogena."

[IllumiNaughtyByNature]

If he is trying to steer the direction of the dialogue wouldn’t that be considered beneficial to the overall agrument? You’re calling the end result an un-provable conclusion yet both sides of the argument are un-provable, by scientific standards, no?