Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How John McCain may still lose the nomination (Huckabee's delegate math)
The Forerunner Forum (FL) ^ | February 14, 2008 | Jay Rogers

Posted on 02/22/2008 11:27:13 PM PST by Kurt Evans

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 last
To: ElPatriota

Huckaphoney has no prayer, no matter how long he prays for victory.


101 posted on 02/24/2008 12:34:34 PM PST by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Paulus Invictus
...Huckaphoney has no prayer, no matter how long he prays for victory....

"Paulos Invictus," That's it?...That is your statement? :)... I don't know who your candidates, probably Macaca? :), well, hold on to your pants because he will lOSE! :)

102 posted on 02/24/2008 2:05:20 PM PST by ElPatriota (Duncan Hunter 08 -- I am proud to support this man for my president and may be Huck :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: All

bump!


103 posted on 02/24/2008 4:45:34 PM PST by Sun (Duncan Hunter:pro-God/life/borders, understands Red China threat, NRA A+rating!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: unspun; ElPatriota

Maybe you two can explain something to me.

Other than the fact that he’s a social conservative, what’s the attraction?
I’m a social conservative, so I truly admire that about him.

However, I am also a fiscal conservative, and a national security conservative.
He is neither of those.

Would you please tell me why you support him over others?
It’s a serious question.
I’m not trying to be a smart alec. ;o)


104 posted on 02/24/2008 5:02:35 PM PST by dixiechick2000 (There ought to be one day-- just one-- when there is open season on senators. ~~ Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: dixiechick2000

National security = border security, and we can’t trust McAmnesty to secure our borders.

Huckabee’s not perfect, either, but he must be far better at securing our borders than McCain, because he convinced MINUTEMAN Gilchrist and Duncan Hunter that he has mended his ways, and they endorsed Huckabee, not McAmnesty.


105 posted on 02/24/2008 5:20:32 PM PST by Sun (Duncan Hunter:pro-God/life/borders, understands Red China threat, NRA A+rating!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: ElPatriota

Yup, that’s my statement. Sorry it clashes with yours, but Huck is toast. My candidate was Fred, a real conservative. Sadly, he’s gone.


106 posted on 02/24/2008 5:29:04 PM PST by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: dixiechick2000
Other than the fact that he’s a social conservative, what’s the attraction? I’m a social conservative, so I truly admire that about him. However, I am also a fiscal conservative, and a national security conservative. He is neither of those.

I believe that Mike Huckabee is a fiscal conservative. He is, however someone, like Lincoln, Arthur, and McKinley, who would conserve conservative American principles, rather than a Coolidge "all business is goood business" heretic (of which we have many -- maybe even most, in FR).

But, to answer your question, in addition to being an excellent leader in communication and persuasion, I'll post you again with the line items.

107 posted on 02/24/2008 7:20:42 PM PST by unspun (Mike Huckabee: Government's job is "protect us, not have to provide for us." Duncan Hunter knows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: dixiechick2000

MIKE HUCKABEE

- Pro-Life Leadership (instead of begrudging lip service)
- Pro-1st Amendment (against McCain-Feingold)
- Pro-2nd Amendment (America’s first Conceal & Carry Permit Governor)
- Pro-10th Amendment
- Pro-Sovereignty, Anti-Globalist/Corporatist control
- Pro-Israel (no land giveaways for false peace)
- Pro-Marriage
- Pro-Overwhelming Defense
- Pro-Border Security & Immigration Enforcement (”no amnesty” pledge, plus pledged to Sen. Sessions’ criteria)
- Small Government Fiscal Conservative (signed “no tax increase” pledge)
- Pro-Opportunity Society
- Pro-American Business
- Pro-American Wage Earner
- Pro-Tax Reform
- Pro-Personal Investment
- Pro-Individual Healthcare Empowerment
- Pro-Private/Home Education

It would be shameful not to back him up vs. John McCain.

Or, you can just salve your soul with the anti-Huckabee slander. (But remember, Ronald Reagan was less conservative in California than Mike Huckabee in Arkansas, with their 7:1 Democrat legislature.)

Come in, have a look, and pitch in, if you like:
http://www.mikehuckabee.com


108 posted on 02/24/2008 7:28:26 PM PST by unspun (Mike Huckabee: Government's job is "protect us, not have to provide for us." Duncan Hunter knows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: unspun; Sun

Thank you both for the information, and your kind replies.


109 posted on 02/24/2008 8:30:55 PM PST by dixiechick2000 (There ought to be one day-- just one-- when there is open season on senators. ~~ Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: dixiechick2000

Thanks for the thanks and you’re welcome for the welcome.

“to protect and serve”


110 posted on 02/24/2008 10:40:46 PM PST by unspun (Mike Huckabee: Government's job is "protect us, not have to provide for us." Duncan Hunter knows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: dixiechick2000
unpsun: Coolidge "all business is goood business"

BTW, that may not be a completely fair criticism of ol' Cal, but it speaks of the attitude of "country club Republicans" or the "Republican elites," etc. -- people who, for example, see "free trade" in terms of gives license to multinational corporations, rather than what provides for the economic liberty of American citizens.

His actual, famous quote, I think is, "The business of America is business."

111 posted on 02/24/2008 10:48:58 PM PST by unspun (Mike Huckabee: Government's job is "protect us, not have to provide for us." Duncan Hunter knows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: dixiechick2000
...Maybe you two can explain something to me....

Other than the fact that he’s a social conservative, what’s the attraction? I’m a social conservative, so I truly admire that about him.

You know, I am cursed by not being able to write short. Probably because I want to make the whole case in one pots. I really don't enjoy this short exchanges with FR members, unless I think they accomplish something... I would bet that I could not CHANGE even one's person's mind on anything, of the ones who actually post here :)" I believe that!... I had written a LONG post to you but my computer hung and I lost it! :) so maybe it was destiny.

...Other than the fact that he’s a social conservative, what’s the attraction?... I’m a social conservative, so I truly admire that about him.

Why Huck you ask? As a Social-Conservative I would answer, WHE ELSE?

If I thought for a minute that Huck would be another Carter (Christian Left :), I would not even consider him. The problem with the "Christina Left" is that these people are "so good" they live in another world. You know, someone slaps you and you suppose to turn the other cheek. Always crying for killers rather than the victims, etc. The "Christian Right" has a different approach... And that is where Social-Conservatives fall on, imo.

Don't misunderstand... MONEY, FREEDOM are very important but so are social-values. Money is always important and you should give businesses the ability to make it and create jobs and a good life for its citizens. But not to the point where they destroy or pollute great great parts of the the environment. People who love fishing, boating, canoing, hiking, Kayaking (ME:)... Love beautiful nature, right? I am sure most people here hates to see a polluted, stinking lake or river. However, some people might think a "true conservative" should consider corporation's only obligation is to make $$$$ and to hell with everything else. But I can't believe "conservatives" are all like that.

Now, a second kind of pollution, the destruction of the 'culture' or what we call 'Social-Values.' Same principle, just because $$$ and Freedoms and State rights, and guns and the constitution are important. Social-Values are NOT LESS important if not more important that some of these conservative principles. So it is only natural that for some of us, Social Values are VERY important, enough to place them first and thus the division we seem to have, "Conservatives" Vs. "Social-Conservatives."

Ok, finally, let me try your question. I heard all kinds of allegations against Huck. I have heard him talk at lenght explain all these points. In short, on Defense, he has pledge a strong Military free of Fags. On the border / Illegal Immigration (signed Amnesty pledge). On Social-Values, very strong language with homos and baby killers, so VERY pleased on that too. On Fiscal principles... I like him too, but then I happen to admire Lou Dobbs from Cnn... So what is ok with me, I'm sure is blasphemy with fiscal conservatives. But then look at GW (bigger government, spending...). The point is, no one is perfect and I wonder if anyone can please everyone on every point so it follows one should vote for the candidate that is closer to your most important values or principles.

I would be very unhappy if we have a very good economy but let the environment or allowed corporations to "outsource" every good job simply because it is good for the bottom line. And a lot of other issues like Medicine. All people should have some kind of Medical coverage... I would love if could encourage businesses rather than government to do it. etc etc etc. So I am not impressed by a guy who cares about fiscal values exclusively, NO!... I want someone who are willing to promote the economy, because IT IS IMPORTANT yes, but also willing to care about many other things.

McCain is a man I DON'T TRUST. His CHARACTER IS FLAWED and I don't think there is an inch of his a** that does not belong to some special interest :). I would much rather give Huck the benefit of the doubt or even Obama, it that helps SINK Macaca's presidential aspirations.

112 posted on 02/24/2008 11:56:08 PM PST by ElPatriota (Duncan Hunter 08 -- I am proud to support this man for my president and may be Huck :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: dixiechick2000
Other than the fact that he’s a social conservative, what’s the attraction? I’m a social conservative, so I truly admire that about him.

Huckabee is (1) still in the race, and (2) not John McCain. At this point, a vote for Huckabee is a vote for a brokered convention. I can't see any way in which that would be worse than a straightforward McCain win.

Even if the result of the convention was the renomination of Bob Dole, I'd consider that an improvement over John McCain. At least Bob Dole isn't going to slaughter Republicans in Congress by drawing cross-over voters.

113 posted on 02/25/2008 7:08:40 PM PST by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: ElPatriota

Thank you for your reply.
Actually, I agree with you on many of your points, but not every point.
Differing opinions makes life more interesting, imo. lol
However, you’ve given me food for thought, and I thank you for taking the time to reply.

I’m sorry you lost your first reply.
Dang...I hate when that happens. ;o)


114 posted on 02/25/2008 9:41:16 PM PST by dixiechick2000 (There ought to be one day-- just one-- when there is open season on senators. ~~ Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: supercat
OH...I would so love a brokered convention!
I don't like McCain, either.


"At least Bob Dole isn't going to slaughter Republicans in Congress by drawing cross-over voters."


He's a heckuvalot more likeable, too!

Thank you for your reply.

115 posted on 02/25/2008 9:44:47 PM PST by dixiechick2000 (There ought to be one day-- just one-- when there is open season on senators. ~~ Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

“Nobody has more to feel good about than the Huckabee supporters, he isn’t going to win but you should enjoy every minute of his extraordinary race.”

Thanks for that.


116 posted on 03/13/2008 7:50:31 PM PDT by Kurt Evans (This message not approved by any candidate or candidate's committee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Finalapproach29er

“Maybe we don’t have free will at all.”

I believe that’s what Franklin meant when he said God governs the affairs of man.


117 posted on 03/13/2008 8:16:33 PM PDT by Kurt Evans (This message not approved by any candidate or candidate's committee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson