You're correct that we need to be cautious. But what if he is telling the truth? Do you still think it makes us look stupid?
Do you think smoking crack and cruising bars for anonymous sex just a few years ago is behavior appropriate for a fellow who wants to have sole control of our country's nukes?
Do you think harassing a citizen to keep silent is appropriate behavior for the guy who can order the IRS to audit people?
I don't know whether the guy is on the level or not. But just sweeping a potential character defect like this under the rug is not the right thing to do.
I think that a story like this could be devastating to the Obama camp, if proven. The public would cringe at the thought of a new, more twisted (if that’s possible) replay of Clinton/Lewinsky scenario with Obama and some coked-up loser bobbing for balls in the Oval Office.
There’s not positive way to spin that.
I absolutely agree with you, This guy ought to have his say.
I have been in the unfortunate situation of trying to prove fraud on a company employee, and he had enough people cover for him that I never even got to take a polygraph test that I offered, and he is still ripping that company off every day. Made a fool out of me, but the fact still is that he was/is still guilty and has got away with it. Let this guy present his case, and corroborating evidence and THEN judge him one way or the other
By all meams, do the research. But it’s a glorious waste of time. The guy ain’t right in the head.