Posted on 02/22/2008 8:25:38 PM PST by freespirited
Due to security concerns, we had to move the Larry Sinclair Polygraph up a few days. We conducted it in secret today and the picture to the left is from from one of the two arduous polygraphs Sinclair underwent today.
The process took four grueling hours, testing Sinclair's claims of sex and drug use separately and also including a drug screening to ensure that Sinclair didn't enlist any chemical assistance.
The results are being confirmed by a second expert and we'll have conclusive word, along with video of the whole thing, Monday or Tuesday. Check back then for more, including video the tests and, of course, the results.
"The results are being confirmed by a second expert..."
The word "confirmed" infers that Sinclair was deemed truthful by the first analyst, IMO. Otherwise, "reviewed" or "independently examined" or words to that effect might have been better.
Could be ‘confirmed to be false’ I reckon.
What about two images, one of Larry and one of a hot blonde lobbyist? The voiceover asks, "Which of these do you wish your President had hit?"
IF a marxist POS goes down because of the Clintons, Larry SInclair, coke use, GOPers, or anything else it does not matter. What matters is that he is away from the reigns of power. He is an enemy within, bigtime.
|
Lots of folks here giving Obama the benefit of the doubt. Most wish they were in Larry’s place in the limo, I reckon.
Offer up a $100,000 and men will be crawling out of the woodwork to claim they gave Obama a hummer.
"They all talk, don't they, the little brats!"
Except he made the claim long before he got the offer of cash for the polygraph. And FWIW, Michelle, he’s vowed to donate it to charity.
“It’s interesting that Obama would have sex with a white homosexual.”
I guess if you’re gonna stray from the path, you might as well go totally off the Reservation.
He said he'd donate money to charity after they pay off his debts.
Look, I'm no Obama fan but, please, this story is bottom-feeder garbage.
Could be. But "confirmed" is a positive word, an affirmative word. If whitehouse.com wants Sinclair to pass - - and I think that's the result that would serve them well - - then they need to have a positive result "confirmed".
On the other hand, if Larry failed, then whitehouse.com would NOT want that result "confirmed", they would want that result "reviewed", "evaluated", re-examined", etc.
I know I missed it, but is the LS story the reason why Obama was so lame in the debate last night here in Austin?
Workin large hours and can’t freep up with latest.
Ignore it then.
The man is a marxist POS and you should be praying that Sinclair takes him out.
It's not that, it is just that while if is true this will destroying Obama's campaign and Hillary will be the nominee but if it is false, and right wing sites promote it, it will discredit legitimate attacks against Obama as outlandish smears. So I think most people are taking a wait and see attitude to see if he passes the polygraph and/or if others come forward with similar stories about Obama. Someone who would pick a ramdom guy (let's face it, if Obama is gay he could do way better that Sinclair) would do it repeatedly over the years and into the present day. Crack is a very addictive drug, I doubt anyone could hide a decade long crack habit.
" . . . the subject is not stressed by lying; . . . "
In this case, true, because there is no risk or peril , hence no stress and extremely difficult to choose a control question.
[ ... snip ... ]
" . . . and are based on the premise that lying triggers those stress responses."
While I would normally agree, guilty knowledge would be more accurate than the possibility of lying in accounting for stress, for you cover both bases with guilty knowledge though not necessarily an indicator of guilt or complicity.
[ ... snip ... ]
" . . . This is a publicity stunt, . . . "
That should be one of the questions. ;>
LOL. Could be, but I’m more interested now to find out if your “LS” is really our LS
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.