Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Larry Sinclair Completed 4 Hour Polygraph Test Today
whitehouse.com ^ | 2/22/08

Posted on 02/22/2008 8:25:38 PM PST by freespirited

Due to security concerns, we had to move the Larry Sinclair Polygraph up a few days. We conducted it in secret today and the picture to the left is from from one of the two arduous polygraphs Sinclair underwent today.

The process took four grueling hours, testing Sinclair's claims of sex and drug use separately and also including a drug screening to ensure that Sinclair didn't enlist any chemical assistance.

The results are being confirmed by a second expert and we'll have conclusive word, along with video of the whole thing, Monday or Tuesday. Check back then for more, including video the tests and, of course, the results.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: larrysinclair; obama; polygraph
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 241 next last
To: freespirited

This guy has nothing to gain from doing this. If he were lying he would be drawing it out to keep the “rumor” out there. He’s moving quickly. Perhaps a Hillary supporter :)

It will be interesting to see what Larry Flynt does. He consitently carries the Democrat water I’d like for “target” Larry to be telling the truth just to see Flynt squirm. The freak.


101 posted on 02/22/2008 9:37:49 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (Benedict Arnold was against the Terrorist Surveillance Program)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam
They might say that about gay blowjobbery but they can't say that about crack smoking.

Sure they can. Private drug use that is only illegal because the American people in their view are small minded. Unless you can connect it to a particular political decision THEY DISAGREE WITH, they consider it a private matter.
102 posted on 02/22/2008 9:38:40 PM PST by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder
I don’t think the country’s ever had a muslim coke-head homo sex addict president before. No wonder the left is crazy about him.

LOL !!! In all seriousness, do you think this will carry over into the GE and get any traction?
103 posted on 02/22/2008 9:40:39 PM PST by no dems (Global Warming advocates have the IQ of a can of Spam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Does anyone think this will get traction in the General Election?


104 posted on 02/22/2008 9:41:03 PM PST by no dems (Global Warming advocates have the IQ of a can of Spam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MittFan08
If this story is going to be believable, Sinclair needs to find that limo driver to at least corroborate that Obama was in the same vehicle with him. Or if the driver said “no comment” then even that would tell us a good bit.

Or at least find somebody to claim they were the limo driver and offer them money to corroborate on a story.

105 posted on 02/22/2008 9:41:12 PM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Fox_Mulder77

Offering up the limo driver does lend a degree of credibility. Sort of like Jose Canseco. Jose’s accusation seemed pretty outrageous, but most of his claims turned out to be true.

I have noticed that Obama is not making any moves to sue this guy for defamation.


106 posted on 02/22/2008 9:41:37 PM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Rudder
The trouble with all this fuss, is that “lie detector” polygraphs yield unreliable results. They are easy to fake as well.

Polygraphs do not detect lies. They detect physiological stress, and are based on the premise that lying triggers those stress responses. They are useless if:

- the subject believes what he's saying, either because he's delusional or because he's managed to convince himself that the lie is true;

- the subject is not stressed by lying; or

- the subject has learned to control or mask those physiological responses.

There's a reason polygraphs have never been admissible in court. They might help as an investigative lead, but they don't prove anything. This is a publicity stunt, and no matter the outcome of the test, we still have a conveniently-timed story by one person with no corroboration.

107 posted on 02/22/2008 9:42:17 PM PST by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: purpleraine

“I thought the “science” of polygraphy called for short sessions?”

Depends upon the questions. I’ve heard of ‘em taking hours per day and several days.

Last one I had only took about 45 minutes. But they were straightforward “easy” questions and we did four passes.


108 posted on 02/22/2008 9:47:58 PM PST by PLMerite ("Unarmed, one can only flee from Evil. But Evil isn't overcome by fleeing from it." Jeff Cooper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ReignOfError
This is a publicity stunt...

That's the word I was looking for.

109 posted on 02/22/2008 9:48:53 PM PST by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: ReignOfError

Maybe other men who have given BHO a bj will now feel comfortable sharing their experiences? Who knows?


110 posted on 02/22/2008 9:48:59 PM PST by Comparative Advantage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Who had him on the radio?


111 posted on 02/22/2008 9:50:08 PM PST by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Since our last correspndence, I’ve excercised my libertarian right to partake in experimental Herbal Relaxation Therapy. As a result, I am no longer capable of disagreeing with anyone. Sorry.


112 posted on 02/22/2008 9:51:45 PM PST by soupcon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

How many times will we all allow ourselves to be manipulated by the Clinton machine....

Like I’ve said for many weeks (ad nauseum, I know) this is nothing but one of the nukes being launched at Obama by the wounded Clinton b*ttmunchers. I have that gut feeling (from experience watching the Clintons work) that this is almost surely bogus, that it is almost surely manufactured directly by Hillary’s operatives.

She/Bill will NEVER accept defeat, and will stop at nothing—no matter how ludicrous. It won’t be the last nuke fired, it is only the beginning.

Hillary will be the nominee thanks primarily to these horsesh*t tactics. She certainly could never be nominated on merit or mandate. And we all know that.


113 posted on 02/22/2008 9:55:28 PM PST by Husker8877
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: soupcon
I’ve excercised my libertarian right to partake in experimental Herbal Relaxation Therapy. As a result, I am no longer capable of disagreeing with anyone. Sorry.

But damnit, I sure am hungry

114 posted on 02/22/2008 9:56:15 PM PST by tx_eggman ("they want to be judged on their intentions, not their results" - libtards official motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite

Thanx. My experience was about 20 years ago. We seemed to never have more than 15 questions. Of course we were doing simple investigations.


115 posted on 02/22/2008 9:58:25 PM PST by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

It’s interesting that Obama would have sex with a white homosexual. I wonder if it’s kinda like a status symbol among black presidential candidates to trot about showing off their gay white freaks. On the other hand, homosexuals appear to be quite open to bi-racial relationships. Sorta like going to Cuinidad-Juarez (Boys Town) just across the Texas border into Mexico and paying $10 for a gum-job from a toothless old Yaqui Indian in an alley.

I wonder also what Dr. Phil would have to say about this?

Enquiring minds want to know!!


116 posted on 02/22/2008 10:02:12 PM PST by perchprism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

IF they did, and he’s telling the truth, then hat tip to Ickes/Blumenthal


117 posted on 02/22/2008 10:03:27 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: MittFan08

Same damn reason they won’t touch the story with a 10 foot pole. They fear its true.


118 posted on 02/22/2008 10:04:19 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: no dems
In all seriousness, do you think this will carry over into the GE and get any traction?

In all seriousness, once Obama becomes the nominee, the Dems will make him their messiah to exclusion of whatever realities that need to be thrust aside. My opinion anyway.
119 posted on 02/22/2008 10:05:02 PM PST by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: soupcon
He’s nuts. Which gives him an advantage with polygraphs.

Whatever. As long as he passes and that scumbag Obama has to face the music.

120 posted on 02/22/2008 10:05:11 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 241 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson