Some seem quite satisfied with "anonymous sources." Bet they wouldn't be if it was their reputation on the line.
“Where’s the proof?”
Some seem quite satisfied with “anonymous sources.” Bet they wouldn’t be if it was their reputation on the line.”
How do explain this on the record meeting:
“In its own follow-up story, The Washington Post quoted longtime aide John Weaver, who split with McCain last year, as saying he met with lobbyist Iseman and urged her to steer clear of McCain.”
Sounds quoted, and factual.
Pretty disturbing, coming from Freepers.
It's one thing to say you won't vote for the guy, or you don't like his policies, but it seems some are more than happy to believe McCain to be guilty before the whole truth is clear.
For what? To see him harmed politically?
That's sad. Really pathetic.