I think both items may have been a little mis-information and/or simply laying the groundwork for an excuse on a pass on one shot/orbit while waiting for the next. Most people don't want to hear the gory technical details, and some of them we don't want released.
"A major interception issue is the limited target interception window. Assuming initial/mid-course command & control is limited to line-of-sight, a low-orbit target is a heckuva a challenge since horizon-to-horizon transit time is limited. Acquiring the target, calculating and downloading the initial azimuth/attitude launch parameters to the missile, launching the missile, and providing en-route guidance to place the warhead in the terminal acquistion basket in less than a couple of minutes is impressive, computer-asisted or not.
To put an additional "spin" on this, think of angular velocity and shooting skeet. A low-orbit satellite has a very high angular velocity compared to, say the ISS or GPS sats, or to an ICBM at mid-course apogee. Hitting a bird with a high angular velocity requires a helluva lot of target lead/windage.
Acquiring/targeting/launching/guiding/hitting a low-orbit target is a significant accomplishment. Gratz to all concerned!"
Bravo Zulu to the U.S.S. LAKE ERIE! The boys done good. :-)