Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon Opens Window of Time to Shoot Down Satellite
American Forces Press Service ^ | Gerry J. Gilmore

Posted on 02/20/2008 3:58:23 PM PST by SandRat

WASHINGTON, Feb. 20, 2008 – The Pentagon has opened the window of time in which it will shoot down a malfunctioning U.S. reconnaissance satellite, a senior U.S. military officer said here today.

Today’s return of the space shuttle Atlantis to Earth prompted the start of the optimal time period for shooting down the satellite, which extends until about the end of the month, the senior officer told Pentagon reporters.

Only “tens of seconds” will be available each day for a favorable launch of a ship-based SM-3 interceptor missile, the senior officer said. “The window is small, … but we’re looking for the best orientation of the satellite” before launching the missile, the officer explained.

The 5,000-pound satellite malfunctioned soon after it was launched in 2006, making it unresponsive to ground control. It is carrying a tank full of hydrazine, a toxic rocket fuel. The satellite, orbiting every 90 minutes or so, was expected to fall to Earth in February or March with its tank of hydrazine intact, possibly endangering human populations.

President Bush directed the Defense Department to engage the satellite just before it enters the atmosphere at about 150 miles above the Earth. The goal is for the missile to hit and rupture the tank of rocket fuel, causing the hydrazine to burn up harmlessly in the atmosphere, along with debris from the stricken satellite.

About 50 percent of debris produced by the missile strike is expected to burn up during the stricken satellite’s first two orbits after being hit, the senior military officer said, with the rest burning up shortly after. The strike is designed to leave no space debris.

Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates is to give the order to launch, based upon commanders’ recommendations, the senior officer said. Gates will be advised as to the optimal time to launch by the commander of U.S. Strategic Command, based at Offutt Air Force Base, in Omaha, Neb.

All space sensor and missile-tracking activity related to the missile launch is being coordinated by the Joint Space Operations Center, at Vandenberg Air Force Base, Calif. Sensors, such as large radars and telescopes, are being coordinated by the Joint Integrated Missile Defense Team in Colorado Springs, Colo., under the U.S. Army’s Space and Missile Defense Command.

Three U.S. Navy ships -- the cruiser USS Lake Erie and the destroyers USS Decatur and USS Russell -- are posted in the Pacific Ocean waiting for an optimal time to launch, the senior officer said. The Erie is slated to shoot at the satellite, and it is fitted with two SM-3 missiles. The Decatur has one, and the Russell has none. The missiles were modified to carry additional sensor equipment for the mission, the senior officer said.

The launch will be conducted during daytime over the Pacific, the senior officer explained, so that all sensors involved can better track the results of the missile launch. Necessary criteria for launch include satisfactory alignment of all pre-launch sensor-supplied data, as well as favorable weather conditions, he said.

Currently, the wave height about the ships is unfavorable to launch, the officer said. However, this and other conditions are subject to change, he added.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; US: Colorado; US: Nebraska
KEYWORDS: dod; down; missiledefense; offuttafb; satellite; shoot; shootdown; usaf; usn; ussdecatur; usslakeerie; ussrussell; vandenbergafb
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-286 next last
To: Desron13

Probably not. I think we were sending a loud and clear message to Russia and China. Does anyone know how our shoot down compares to China’s shoot down last year?

Just curious.


261 posted on 02/20/2008 8:25:53 PM PST by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: Westlander

Yep- but I’m think real science, real-world stuff :)


262 posted on 02/20/2008 8:26:35 PM PST by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Agree this story should be in the Breaking News Section.


263 posted on 02/20/2008 8:30:25 PM PST by jveritas (God bless our brave troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

I imagine this would be filed under ‘need to know’. And what you are allowed to know is just a fragment of the entire plan/operation/capability....etc.


264 posted on 02/20/2008 8:33:43 PM PST by Westlander (Unleash the Neutron Bomb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire
"Probably not. I think we were sending a loud and clear message to Russia and China. Does anyone know how our shoot down compares to China’s shoot down last year?"

I think that we're telling them that we can launch orbital vehicles from just about any large mobile platform that we want and that we can replenish our vital military space assets faster than they can shoot them down. Additionally, we can shoot your's down much faster than you can replace them. Very cool.

265 posted on 02/20/2008 8:36:06 PM PST by Desron13 (If you constantly vote between the lesser of two evils then evil is your ultimate destination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: Desron13

Good point. This is so cool! Can’t wait to hear more news. The sad thing looming on the horizon is that if Obama gets elected, we can probaly kiss this technology away.

The libs hate Star Wars (as you know)!


266 posted on 02/20/2008 8:44:59 PM PST by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: neodad
If we can hit this on the first try, we can hit anything our enemies might throw at us.

Just pray that we don't elect a democrat, who would apologize for what we have done.

And would promise that we would never use this technology in anger.

Not only that, but we would share it with our enemies because it would begin to open the door to friendship, co-operation, and mutual understanding.

And truly liking each other, regardless of our differences.

Support B. Hussein O'Bama, the Irish-American candidate and his gastric woman for first lady.

267 posted on 02/20/2008 8:49:59 PM PST by Octar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire
"The libs hate Star Wars (as you know)!"

Sadly, yes...

268 posted on 02/20/2008 8:51:00 PM PST by Desron13 (If you constantly vote between the lesser of two evils then evil is your ultimate destination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: Desron13

Good night folks, it’s been fun.


269 posted on 02/20/2008 9:00:32 PM PST by Desron13 (If you constantly vote between the lesser of two evils then evil is your ultimate destination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: gridlock

It’s always very red. I missed this one’s totality, but it looks a lot like the last one. Dark brown red. Very nice.


270 posted on 02/20/2008 9:14:58 PM PST by MartinStyles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

No, I came home awhile ago and learned about it. Awesome.
I like the way they were talking earlier like it might not happen, kept everyone guessing:)


271 posted on 02/20/2008 9:37:32 PM PST by La Enchiladita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

They nailed it. :)


272 posted on 02/20/2008 9:41:46 PM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire

I believe that their target was still in it’s stable orbit, so they knew exactly where it was.
It could also have been still broadcasting some kind of signal that would allow it to be homed in on.


273 posted on 02/20/2008 9:46:33 PM PST by RS ("I took the drugs because I liked them and I found excuses to take them, so I'm not weaseling.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: zot; neodad
Remember, PMRF on Kauai has some very good radar used for all the MDA tests similar to this. They certainly had the gear up, running, and recording. That is it's mission in life and they were perfectly situated to see it.

Does make you wonder at the convenience of it all..............Prolly just serendipity.

274 posted on 02/20/2008 9:50:44 PM PST by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
What poor USAF slob got the assignment to measure that with his tape measure?

The Swabbies shot it down, let them measure and count the fragments.

275 posted on 02/20/2008 10:29:50 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: zot
If it is little pieces, as they hoped it would be, the pieces may drift a long way and take a long time to come down.

Actually smaller pieces will in general come down faster, because they are more affected by the slight drag of the upper atmosphere which is present even at the 200+ mile altitude where the dead bird started out.

276 posted on 02/20/2008 10:34:51 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69
Does make you wonder at the convenience of it all..............Prolly just serendipity.

Not really, the satellite went over the entire earth, between about 58 degrees north or south of the equator. They just set up the intercept for a time when the satellite was on a northbound ground track in the appropriate location.

277 posted on 02/20/2008 10:38:04 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
Actually smaller pieces will in general come down faster, because they are more affected by the slight drag of the upper atmosphere

No, smaller pieces come down slower because they are more affected by the drag of the atmosphere all the way down. Of course, it depends on the shape of each piece. For the same weight, a sphere falls fast: a thin piece flutters down slowly.

278 posted on 02/20/2008 11:11:25 PM PST by zot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: zot

But the orbit will decay more quickly the lighter the piece.


279 posted on 02/21/2008 2:37:44 AM PST by gridlock (Proud McCain Supporter since February 7, 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: RS

Thanks for the post. Someone else had said that the Chinese also shot theirs from a land based platform. Looks like we just showed the Chinese/Russians a thing or two about American ingenuity!!

For cryin out loud, even the English and French libbies were complaining about this mission. But if an asteroid is ever headed straight towards for their countries....who do you think they are going to call? (eye roll)


280 posted on 02/21/2008 5:55:16 AM PST by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-286 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson