Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Minnesota Man Claims He Took Drugs & Had Sex with Barack Obama in 1999
The Cleveland Leader ^ | 2/19/2008

Posted on 02/20/2008 7:15:31 AM PST by Pinetop

Barack Obama now faces a new challenge - one that is sure to be much more scandalous than anything he's seen so far. If the allegations are to be believed, it's also a scandal that his campaign has tried to cover up. A Minnesota man has come forth, claiming that he took cocaine in 1999 with Obama, the then-Illinois legislator, and participated in homosexual acts with him.

Larry Sinclair, the man making the claims, said his story was ignored by the news media. Still not willing to let this one slip quietly under the rug, Sinclair made a YouTube video in which he made his case. It's had over half a million views already, but the story has still been largely ignored by the news media.

Sinclair's next step was to file a suit in Minnesota District Court, in which he alleges threats and intimidation by the Democratic presidential candidate's staff.

Still out to prove that he is telling the truth, Sinclair said he is willing to submit to a polygraph test. A website (WhiteHouse.com) has come forth offering him $10,000 for the right to record the polygraph test, and another $100,000 if he passes it.

Sinclair lives in Duluth, Minnesota, and in his filing, charges that his civil rights have been violated by Barack Obama and the Democratic Party. Obama, David Axelrod of AKP Message & Media in Chicago, and the Democratic National Committee have been named as defendants in the case.

Sinclair, who describes himself as gay, claims they met in an upscale Chicago lounge. They left in Sinclair's limo, where the drug use and sex allegedly took place for the first time. Sinclair says that Obama smoked crack cocaine, and that he snorted powder cocaine provided by Obama.

Sinclair, 46, says that he no longer uses drugs. He claims to be physically disabled, but says that he was not physically impaired in 1999 when they met.

Regarding the claims, Sinclair said:

"My motivation for making this public is my desire for a presidential candidate to be honest. I didn't want the sex thing to come out. But I think it is important for the candidate to be honest about his drug use as late as 1999."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: barackhusseinobama; chebama; cocaine; crack; deadhorse; larryflyntstink; nobama; obama; sex; sinclair
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-298 last
To: tomnbeverly
Duh... Half his family is from there... Obviously his grandma lives in a little village there... you aren’t paying much attention to the the Great “” Hope... now are you.

I'm paying better attention than you think, Senator Byrd.

281 posted on 02/20/2008 10:12:44 AM PST by TankerKC (I tried to find more Nixon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: pissant
“What was Paula Jone’s evidence?”

IIRC, there was independent corroboration of much of her story (timeline, location, etc.) from one or more Arkansas state troopers. As for the sordid details, wasn’t it Jones who claimed that Clinton’s johnson had a “distinguishing characteristic”, later revealed to be Peyronie’s Disease? And didn’t Clinton settle Jones’ lawsuit for almost $1 million after two judges on a Federal appeals court express a willingness to allow her case to go forward? Taken together, that’s more than Sinclair has revealed thus far. Maybe other shoes will drop, however.

282 posted on 02/20/2008 10:12:47 AM PST by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: tomnbeverly

Agree on post 101, anything is fair on THIER side. Maybe there will be a scandal about some of his relatives that may have posed nude for National Geographic.........


283 posted on 02/20/2008 10:27:20 AM PST by Quickgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Pinetop

One thing I find interesting is that the Obama campaign tried to cover up the allegations. Were they untrue the wiser political move would be to confront them head on and work to disprove them.

There may really be something to this story.


284 posted on 02/20/2008 10:31:25 AM PST by SlapHappyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinetop

bttt


285 posted on 02/20/2008 4:59:35 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinetop

bttt again


286 posted on 02/20/2008 5:00:01 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinetop

Has Drudge posted anything about this yet?


287 posted on 02/20/2008 5:03:11 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Has Drudge posted anything about this yet?

No, Drudge and MSNBC are busy running unsubstantiated stories on McCain and a lobbyist—very murky on the details-—as a way of avoiding the Obama/Sinclair story. The McCain story has less substance than the Obama story. Terribly unfair stuff coming out of MSNBC and NY Times. Just a suggestion, but no evidence.


288 posted on 02/20/2008 5:13:30 PM PST by Pinetop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: Pinetop

Ah....Al...(Franken) ...NOT the best time to come clean on this one...


289 posted on 02/20/2008 5:14:58 PM PST by NordP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pnh102

Absolutely right. A good portion of his constituency are crackheads so he’ll just cement that core group.


290 posted on 02/20/2008 5:20:13 PM PST by Paved Paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pinetop

Drudge is a real disappointment lately. It’s hard to believe he won’t touch the story about Obama doing cocaine with his gay lover, Larry Sinclair. That kind of stuff is what made Drudge Drudge. Now he’s just another (washed up) blogger.


291 posted on 02/20/2008 5:26:02 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: Pinetop

All right libs,you wanted him you got him.Bend over,here comes Bareback Obama!


292 posted on 02/20/2008 5:34:38 PM PST by Uncle Meat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phoenix07

Oh yes, NYT would be so proud of him.

John


293 posted on 02/20/2008 5:37:09 PM PST by Diggity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GOPRaleigh

Geez...In other words you have no proof. If “He’s proving it for you”, please point out what that proof would be.

I don’t know if the guy is telling the truth or not, for the sake of argument, I’ll stipulate that he probably is not; however, it is one thing to say the guy hasn’t proven his claim and that Barry is innocent until proven guilty, it is another to make hurl an equally unprovable allegation about Barry’s accuser.

If you’re going to make such internally inconsistant arguments, on FR, you should expect to get called on it.


294 posted on 02/21/2008 4:01:19 AM PST by NavVet ( If you don't defend Conservatism in the Primaries, you won't have it to defend in November)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: phoenix07
God - wouldn’t it be something to discover Obama has HIV?

That is a ridiculous reply.

295 posted on 02/21/2008 4:04:08 AM PST by Jackknife ( "The Bureau of Alcohol,Tobacco, and Firearms should be a department store, not a gov't agency.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NavVet

“If you’re going to make such internally inconsistant arguments, on FR, you should expect to get called on it.”

You’re funny - LOL! Again, my proof is HIS video that HE made which proves my point that HE is just a guy with a camcorder, a script and time on his hands who is looking for $.

Lets spend our efforts on legitimate reasons to defeat Obama in November rather than to cling onto this flimsy (at best) material.

There, I have answered your supposed “call” and I now call you out to join us in finding provable, substantive reasons as to why Obama should be defeated in November.


296 posted on 02/21/2008 5:37:40 AM PST by GOPRaleigh ("John McCain is Bob Dole minus the charm, conservatism and youth.” -Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: GOPRaleigh

“HE is just a guy with a camcorder, a script and time on his hands who is looking for $.”

I see the proof that he does indeed own a camcorder of some sort. However, I’m still waiting on an explanation of how the very existence of the video is somehow proof that he was lying or that he was motivate by money?

Let me predict your response. “It’s obvious...,or, everyone knows..., or clearly....” The sad fact is that you are guilty of making the same kind of unsubstantiated allegation that you accuse this guy of making and you simply can’t back up your assertion.

As for Obama in November, may the best liberal win I guess, I don’t really have a dog in that fight any more.


297 posted on 02/21/2008 5:48:31 AM PST by NavVet ( If you don't defend Conservatism in the Primaries, you won't have it to defend in November)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: Pinetop
They left in Sinclair's limo,

This guy is a drug addict and he has his own limo?

298 posted on 02/21/2008 6:02:49 AM PST by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-298 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson