Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Minnesota Man Claims He Took Drugs & Had Sex with Barack Obama in 1999
The Cleveland Leader ^ | 2/19/2008

Posted on 02/20/2008 7:15:31 AM PST by Pinetop

Barack Obama now faces a new challenge - one that is sure to be much more scandalous than anything he's seen so far. If the allegations are to be believed, it's also a scandal that his campaign has tried to cover up. A Minnesota man has come forth, claiming that he took cocaine in 1999 with Obama, the then-Illinois legislator, and participated in homosexual acts with him.

Larry Sinclair, the man making the claims, said his story was ignored by the news media. Still not willing to let this one slip quietly under the rug, Sinclair made a YouTube video in which he made his case. It's had over half a million views already, but the story has still been largely ignored by the news media.

Sinclair's next step was to file a suit in Minnesota District Court, in which he alleges threats and intimidation by the Democratic presidential candidate's staff.

Still out to prove that he is telling the truth, Sinclair said he is willing to submit to a polygraph test. A website (WhiteHouse.com) has come forth offering him $10,000 for the right to record the polygraph test, and another $100,000 if he passes it.

Sinclair lives in Duluth, Minnesota, and in his filing, charges that his civil rights have been violated by Barack Obama and the Democratic Party. Obama, David Axelrod of AKP Message & Media in Chicago, and the Democratic National Committee have been named as defendants in the case.

Sinclair, who describes himself as gay, claims they met in an upscale Chicago lounge. They left in Sinclair's limo, where the drug use and sex allegedly took place for the first time. Sinclair says that Obama smoked crack cocaine, and that he snorted powder cocaine provided by Obama.

Sinclair, 46, says that he no longer uses drugs. He claims to be physically disabled, but says that he was not physically impaired in 1999 when they met.

Regarding the claims, Sinclair said:

"My motivation for making this public is my desire for a presidential candidate to be honest. I didn't want the sex thing to come out. But I think it is important for the candidate to be honest about his drug use as late as 1999."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: barackhusseinobama; chebama; cocaine; crack; deadhorse; larryflyntstink; nobama; obama; sex; sinclair
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-298 next last
To: Fox_Mulder77

Polygraph tests are bogus and not even admissible as evidence in court. If they were, they would be widely used in all criminal cases.

They aren’t even worth the paper they are printed on and it is a waste of time to even hint that the results they produce are valid.


241 posted on 02/20/2008 8:55:12 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (Juan McCain....Viva El Presidente! "I'm not prejudice, I hate everybody the same.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: GOPRaleigh

Please provide a link to prove your assertion that he is “crazy” or just motivated by money. Or are you just making an accusation without any proof.

Remember, it is up to you to prove he is crazy and a liar, he doesn’t have to prove he is not.


242 posted on 02/20/2008 8:56:20 AM PST by NavVet ( If you don't defend Conservatism in the Primaries, you won't have it to defend in November)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: Pinetop

This report, if true, may repulse a few voters, however it is a RESUME ENHANCER to most DEMOCRAT voters!!


243 posted on 02/20/2008 8:58:00 AM PST by PISANO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude

Dems must really be stressing with excitement now, whether to vote for an alleged carpet muncher or a butt burglar...


244 posted on 02/20/2008 9:00:51 AM PST by Quickgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: pissant

And if anyone would sue for something like that, it’d definitely be a “liberal”.


245 posted on 02/20/2008 9:01:42 AM PST by Salamander (And don't forget my Dog; fixed and consequent......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: DallasDeb
This puts Obama at great risk for blackmail. .....Just think what a country like Iran could do to keep the U.S. in line with such information. Clinton’s antics, though criminal (rape), were heterosexual in nature....

Would be devastating! Remember Klintoon and the Chinese who had recordings of his phonesex with Monica.

In this case, a Barcoke Ohomo will be talking to the Mullahs, seated under their desks with the extra pressure to give them more than he will ever want to give.

246 posted on 02/20/2008 9:02:44 AM PST by melancholy (Beware of Ho Chi Minh's offspring, Ho She Marx , invading the WH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: PISANO

Another excellent observation,

The Democrats will protect Obama’s right to privacy like they did Clinton’s and don’t forget Barney Frank and several others like him. After the news came out, they advanced in the party and gained popularity.


247 posted on 02/20/2008 9:03:17 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (Juan McCain....Viva El Presidente! "I'm not prejudice, I hate everybody the same.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
Hillary will have to start snorting publicly while she snacks on the carpet.

Hahhahahahahaaaaaaaaaa

248 posted on 02/20/2008 9:04:00 AM PST by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pinetop

Too many replies on this thread....

...paging, Larry Craigs Lawyer....Larry Craigs Lawyer...
where’s Johnny Cochran?, now that you need him....

the whole thing does smack of a Hillary hitjob however...
if this “scandal” does in Obama, I would guess that many
HIllary supporters will become ex-supporters, and Obama
supporters will go crazy ‘gainst Hillarious....

if it wasn’t so serious, this would be a true example
of the “bonfire of the vanities”

Bring on the popcorn.


249 posted on 02/20/2008 9:04:29 AM PST by Getready (Wisdom is more valuable than gold and diamonds, and harder to find.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinetop

This Sinclair looks suspiciously like Larry the Cable Guy - maybe Obama is making a play for the Gay redneck vote???


250 posted on 02/20/2008 9:04:51 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

YEs, but it is unhelpful in a national election. That is why Clintoon had staff to deal with the bimbo eruptions.


251 posted on 02/20/2008 9:05:33 AM PST by pissant (Time for a CONSERVATIVE party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: NavVet

He’s proving it for me. Geez...


252 posted on 02/20/2008 9:08:02 AM PST by GOPRaleigh ("John McCain is Bob Dole minus the charm, conservatism and youth.” -Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

It ain’t the same unnerstandin’of gravity no’mo. Gravity
is not “gravity” i.e. attractedness of masses....no, mo,son...
it is the curved space around the mass, that alters the
path of the second smaller mass...huh? it ain’t that eider?


253 posted on 02/20/2008 9:09:07 AM PST by Getready (Wisdom is more valuable than gold and diamonds, and harder to find.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Wot???!? No Rock-n-Roll???!?


254 posted on 02/20/2008 9:09:29 AM PST by MozarkDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: evets

GUILTY!


255 posted on 02/20/2008 9:10:15 AM PST by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Like MLK is the icon for the Blacks, Obama is the “Savior” who will make the “Dream” real. IT will only anger them to do nasty things towards the Clintons.

The MSM knows the true potential of what this would do to the Democrat party. They will avoid it like the plague.


256 posted on 02/20/2008 9:10:28 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (Juan McCain....Viva El Presidente! "I'm not prejudice, I hate everybody the same.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com

“he’ll be the darling of the party, a drugged out homo.”

That’s rather ambiguous.

Not quite sure which politician you are referring to.

: )


257 posted on 02/20/2008 9:12:51 AM PST by UCANSEE2 (Just saying what 'they' won't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pinetop

Why didn’t this guy come out during Obama’s Senatorial run?


258 posted on 02/20/2008 9:13:19 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (The Constitution does not give me the authority to run your life - Ron Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pnh102
Why should anyone expect the Democrats today would care if Obama was doing the same?

I was going to tell you that I didn't agree with you because this was a disgusting homosexual act, but then I remembered, we're talking about liberals here. The more depraved the act, the more they like it. ;o)

259 posted on 02/20/2008 9:13:52 AM PST by NRA2BFree ("The time is near at hand which must determine whether Americans are to be free men or slaves!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

“It is virtually impossible in the US for a public figure to win a libel suit.”

How many celebs have successfully sued the National Enquirer? [or similar gossip rags]

Tom Cruise is a the top of the list and I do believe Jennifer Aniston hit them too.

http://injury-law.freeadvice.com/libel_and_slander/public_figure_lawsuit.htm

http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/l/libel_and_slander/index.html?query=NATIONAL%20ENQUIRER&field=org&match=exact

http://www.allbusiness.com/libel-slander/4973390-1.html

http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1E1-libel.html

It happens more often than you think and the courts are starting to enforce suits regardless of the “celebrity status” loophole.

If OB wanted to, he’d have a strong case.

Of course, as the old legal adage goes, the ultimate defense against libel is truth.

Either you have it or you don’t.


260 posted on 02/20/2008 9:14:24 AM PST by Salamander (And don't forget my Dog; fixed and consequent......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-298 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson