1 posted on
02/18/2008 4:40:40 PM PST by
Man50D
To: Man50D
“Sen. McCain should earn the respect of the Republican base by debating Mike Huckabee”
How will this help? Not much of the base cares for Huckabee either.
2 posted on
02/18/2008 4:44:38 PM PST by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: Man50D
This part of the base could care less who McCain debates or doesn’t debate.
3 posted on
02/18/2008 4:47:04 PM PST by
sheana
To: Man50D
Hate to say it. I have never been a Huckabee fan...But Huck could make McCain look like the biggest fool on earth.
McCain should never try to out debate a professional gifted speaker like Huck.
McCain is one of the worst speakers ever, he has that whiney voice, nasty attitude etc...
McCain, creep that he is, should decline this.
4 posted on
02/18/2008 4:49:11 PM PST by
dforest
(Nothing left to say.)
To: Man50D
I wish I had an interest in hearing what either one of them have to say. They are tied for last on the bottom of my list.
5 posted on
02/18/2008 4:49:20 PM PST by
SE Mom
(Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
To: Man50D
I’d lose respect for McCain if he agreed to debate Mr. Huckleberry at this point. Let Huck find some other venue to market himself for future speaking engagements.
6 posted on
02/18/2008 4:49:29 PM PST by
bshomoic
(Waiting for the Second Coming of Reagan will instead give us the Second Coming of Billary)
To: Man50D
Your title is not supported by your article.
8 posted on
02/18/2008 4:50:38 PM PST by
Mr. Brightside
( Ronald Reagan Would Back McCain - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1970504/posts)
To: Man50D
I'll watch, just on the off chance, Huck pushes hard enough for McCains head to explode.
Better now than later.
9 posted on
02/18/2008 4:52:08 PM PST by
Kakaze
(Exterminate Islamofacism and apologize for nothing.....except not doing it sooner!)
To: Man50D
Good but it doesn’t mean much.
10 posted on
02/18/2008 4:52:55 PM PST by
cripplecreek
(Just call me M.O.M. (Maverick Opposed to McCain.))
To: Man50D
The title is misleading. Besides, who cares what either one of them has to say. This would be a huge waste of time.
To: Man50D
16 posted on
02/18/2008 5:14:55 PM PST by
Hitchens
To: Man50D
Bread and circuses for the masses!
17 posted on
02/18/2008 5:20:21 PM PST by
Rudder
To: Man50D
Why doesn’t Huckabee just debate Ron Paul with an empty chair for McCain?
Or was this debate supposed to be just for Huckabee and McCain?
To: Man50D
Talk about a sznooze.
To: Man50D
Who really cares what either one of them has to say? They worked together to knock off the real competition before the voting got to the red states and deprive the voters of a voice the nomination of their own party.
28 posted on
02/19/2008 11:31:09 AM PST by
Eva
(Benedict Arnold was a war hero, too.)
To: Man50D
I’ll dissent from the crowd here and say that I think McCain is pretty effective in debate and interview format ... though not so much as a stump speaker.
He has zero incentive to debate Huckabee at this point, though.
To: Man50D
Maybe Huckabee can repeat his contention that Iraqi WMD’s were shipped to Jordan. And that rather than taxpayers getting their money back we should build a interstate from Main to Florida (when on the east coast) and/or from Washington to California (when on the west coast). Yeah, he is BRILLIANT in debates./s
36 posted on
02/19/2008 12:16:18 PM PST by
allmendream
("A Lyger is pretty much my favorite animal."NapoleonD)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson