You think that the only legitimate reason to return something is because you "bought the wrong thing"?
First, you didn't answer my question.
Secondly, the "reason" you bought it has nothing to do with this.
The fact is that you bought it.
If you used it, the only respectable reason to return it is if it is defective, in which case they should replace it, happily.
What is wrong with accepting responsibility for ones actions?
There, now you have two questions to answer.
Actually, I did. It's not my fault you lack the comprehension skills to understand it.
The fact is that you bought it.
I may not have bought it; perhaps someone else did and gave it as a gift. But suppose I had bought it, that means I should incur costs for returning it? You really are dense, aren't you? Suppose the item wasn’t as described? Supposed it was damaged? Supposed it was the wrong item a result of no fault of my own? You think that's the 'personable responsibility' of the buyer?
If you used it, the only respectable reason to return it is if it is defective, in which case they should replace it, happily.
You are wrong again...a habit of yours, I see. I never mentioned using a thing. In fact, that was the point I was making; one should be able to make a legitimate return without incurring restocking fees. Still confused? Look up the word legitimate. And I have already enumerated several circumstances which should qualify a return without cost. If that simple concept continues to escape you, do yourself a favor and avoid further embarrassment by having someone else explain it to you. You're not worth another minute of my time.