Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Huck

OK, you were brave enough to admit voting 3rd party in 00. (who?) My mistake in conflating Gore into it before, simply forgot the 3rd party angle to the question. Fast thread. I didn’t say no to ‘92. ‘92 and ‘94. The second time was admittedly ill thought out. The first time can go straight to GHWBs door with his “New World Order,” publicly condemning the NRA and “no new taxes.” Emphasis on dissing the NRA. (McCain has big 2nd Amend. problems too.)


518 posted on 02/17/2008 5:29:12 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 510 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye
I didn’t say no to ‘92. ‘92 and ‘94.

You mean 96, right? Thanks for answering. 92 was the easy one. The other, as I said, was a toss up between 96 or 00. I voted Libertarian Party in 00. It was a waste of time. After that, I learned my lesson. In the primaries, try to get the best you can get. In the general, pick one of the two. Sitting out or voting fringe is a meaningless waste of time.

520 posted on 02/17/2008 5:32:57 PM PST by Huck (Support OBAMA in 08--He's a better choice than McCain! Ask any conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 518 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson