To: Huck
OK, but assuming McCain is our nominee, and assuming you think we're better off if he loses, that means we're better off if the DEM wins, right?I don't live in the land of assumptions but if I wanted to deal with a five year old's logic I would have had children.
385 posted on
02/17/2008 4:03:58 PM PST by
TigersEye
(This is the age of the death of reason.)
To: TigersEye
Pathetic evasion. Not surprising. Another one in denial. It’s real simple: either you want McCain to win or you want him to lose. If you want him to lose, you want the DEM to win. It’s perfect, irrefutable logic.
386 posted on
02/17/2008 4:05:08 PM PST by
Huck
(Support OBAMA in 08--He's a better choice than McCain! Ask any conservative!)
To: TigersEye
... if I wanted to deal with a five year old's logic I would have had children. LOL! Perfect!
405 posted on
02/17/2008 4:16:01 PM PST by
calcowgirl
("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
To: TigersEye
It isn't the five year old part giving you trouble, it is the logic part.
It isn't forgiving to the hissy-fit position.
407 posted on
02/17/2008 4:17:26 PM PST by
JasonC
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson