To: Huck
Allow me to summarize the article: OBAMA IN 08! I would go for that. Much better to have a clearly defined adversary. McCain only serves to divide the party, Obama would unite us.
112 posted on
02/17/2008 11:24:56 AM PST by
upsdriver
(This November, write in Duncan Hunter for president. Tell the GOPansy party to shove it.!)
To: upsdriver
I would go for that. At least someone admits it: the so-called "real" conservatives support giving the Socialist Party a president with a mandate. I'll be sure to give you all credit when/if it comes to pass.
114 posted on
02/17/2008 11:25:52 AM PST by
Huck
(Sit out and pout! OBAMA in 08! The conservatives' choice!)
To: upsdriver
I see Hillary still winning the nomination because of her Super-Delegates. If she talks Obama into being her veep, we are in for a world of hurt. Best thing to do now is to prepare for 2012. McCain going down in flames may be the best thing that can happen to the Republican party. It really disgusts me to see all the party hacks lining up to back him.
118 posted on
02/17/2008 11:29:14 AM PST by
Left2Right
("Democracy isn't perfect, but other governments are so much worse (especially Iran's)")
To: upsdriver
“I would go for that. Much better to have a clearly defined adversary. McCain only serves to divide the party, Obama would unite us.”
Dittos! He will not only divide the party, he diminish the Conservative membership by taking it so far to the left that the majority will be more like the Dems than the party of Reagan and Goldwater.
121 posted on
02/17/2008 11:30:10 AM PST by
SOSUSA
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson