Why would the author feel it necessary to assure us it’s OK to trust Schmucklebee unless the vibes are that the Huckster can’t be trusted.
While I don't disagree with your assessment of Huckabee, I disagree strongly with your logic. You seem to be assuming that because the author is aware of a widespread sense that Huckabee is untrustworthy, the author must therefore be aware that Huckabee in fact untrustworthy, and thus anything he says to the contrary is a lie. That pattern of logic is one of the keys to Liberal Mind Fog. Conservatives had best beware of it.
Don’t tell me to beware of anything.
What do YOU do all day here - critique every FReeper’s logic skills?