[ansel12]

“It is an accurate observation and conforms to the reasoning I already gave you...which has nothing to do with comparing Romney to Reagan as men or on the issues per sey, rather simply points to the concept which both Reagan and Romney (and many others) have engaged in...and it is a valid concept, and is a valid statement.”

---

You compared Reagan’s endorsement of Ford 32 years ago inside of the bloody convention pit as the same as Mitt’s endorsement, that misleads the vast number of people that don’t know the fascinating facts of Reagan’s 1976 battle and you will not leave it alone.

You seem very determined to push the Romney endorsement, Reagan endorsement are the same, theme.

If the remaining challenger endorses McCain in time, it probably won’t be similar to Reagan’s either, but then his supporters probably won’t try and claim that is was.

[Jeff Head]

Sorry, despite my explanations to the contrary, you are the one who seems determimed to make my observations of what happened...which were clinical and factual in nature...something more than what they were intended.

So be it. We've both had our say. At least for me at this point...'nuff said.