Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Silverback
Why is it conservative to accept an inept commander-in-chief in a time of war?

Strong defense is only a portion of what one looks for in a Conservative- One who is deficit in other respects, regardless of his military credentials is to be rejected. So, in a word, yes it is conservative to reject a candidate who is not Conservative, thereby accepting the inept Democrat.

Now might you answer a question for me? What makes you think that putting a traitorous bastard in command would be any better? Shall our troops be forced to salute one so devoid of honor simply because he is "our" traitorous bastard?

111 posted on 02/15/2008 1:12:50 PM PST by roamer_1 (Conservative always, Republican no more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]


To: roamer_1
Now might you answer a question for me? What makes you think that putting a traitorous bastard in command would be any better? Shall our troops be forced to salute one so devoid of honor simply because he is "our" traitorous bastard?

Even if that characterization of McCain were accurate, you have admitted you are willing to saddle them with an unqualified Dem traitor instead of a Republican "traitor" who will at least prosecute the war and has a pro-military voting record..

Please, don't start thinking you're doing the troops any favors by saddling them with Hillary or Obama. That dog won't hunt.

124 posted on 02/15/2008 4:34:31 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (It is not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson