Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bootless
I believe JFK won the Electoral vote which is what really counts. THere was no problem with low turnout, either-- 63.1% of registered voters turned out, versus 43.6% in 2006. source

As for one vote per district, the closest contest was in Illinois, where Kennedy won by some 9000 votes. It was the most hotly contested (think FL, or Ohio more recently), but the truth is that either way, Kennedy had the electoral vote wrapped up with 303 electoral votes to Nixon's 219.

The total popular vote difference was only about 112,000 votes, but those are not what elects the president, electoral votes do. Wikipedia, some information contested in the article

The popular vote spread can be thinned by overwhelming votes for a candidate in one jurisdiction (where they won) and overwhelming votes for their opponent in another (where their opponent won), without changing the electoral vote, so averaging the vote out over all districts can be misleading.

287 posted on 02/15/2008 7:51:11 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies ]


To: Smokin' Joe

Thanks for all that information. After 2000, I know we all got a good, close-up look at the Electoral College.

I appreciate the work you put into your post - I’ll take a look at the link later on.


295 posted on 02/15/2008 8:57:27 PM PST by bootless (Never Forget - And Never Again. And Always Act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson