To: Old Lady
Against her? No way, we need her to be the nominee.
2 posted on
02/14/2008 3:11:09 PM PST by
SengirV
To: SengirV
"Against her? No way, we need her to be the nominee." Why? Because the MSM media says McCain does better against her? I say let's put a fork in her now, and deal with the next one.
9 posted on
02/14/2008 3:13:53 PM PST by
TommyDale
(Never forget the Republicans who voted for illegal immigrant amnesty in 2007!)
To: SengirV
And if she wins against McCain?
12 posted on
02/14/2008 3:15:27 PM PST by
kabar
To: SengirV
No you do not.
Hillary will likely take Florida.
Obama will not.
I live in both Pa and Florida and if you can tell me how the GOP can win without Florida, then I’ll agree.
22 posted on
02/14/2008 3:22:16 PM PST by
bill1952
(I will vote for McCain if he resigns his Senate seat before this election.)
To: SengirV
geez, yeah, she needs to be the nominee!
30 posted on
02/14/2008 3:28:48 PM PST by
wildwood
To: SengirV
[we need her to be the nominee.]
I agree!
41 posted on
02/14/2008 3:39:09 PM PST by
dbacks
(Taglines for sale or rent.)
To: SengirV
Against her? No way, we need her to be the nominee. Why? We need to stop her in the primaries but in case we don't succeed, then at least we have the general election as a firewall.
If she's the nominee, we have only have ONE shot at her. Are you that confident of the GOP candidate's aim?
What would you rather have, worst case scenario, a four year rookie Obama administration or another 8 years of the Clinton crime syndicate?
50 posted on
02/14/2008 3:56:20 PM PST by
varon
(Allegiance to the constitution, always. Allegiance to a political party, never.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson