Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WOSG; floriduh voter; Amerigomag
Just because you support a candidate doesn't mean you agree with everything they advocate.

Really. Politics makes strange bedfellows. Does this move in 1976 by Ronald Reagan negate all the conservative principles he espoused and worked for before and after? I think not. Romney didn't say he'd choose Lincoln Chafee or Chuck Hagel as VP, all he did was say he'd support our party's presumptive nominee. Sheesh. This impossible standard which everyone is being held to is really getting tiresome. Had it been in place in 1980, we would have rejected one of the best Presidents our country has ever known.

Reagan had promised, if nominated, to name Senator Richard Schweiker of Pennsylvania as his running mate, in a bid to attract liberals and centrists in the party. This move backfired, however, as many conservatives (such as Senator Helms) were infuriated by Reagan's choice of the "liberal" Schweiker, while few moderate delegates switched to Reagan. Helms promptly began a movement to draft conservative Senator James L. Buckley of New York as the presidential nominee.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1976_Republican_National_Convention

319 posted on 02/15/2008 11:15:57 AM PST by redgirlinabluestate (Don't blame me, I told everyone we had to unite for Mitt in order to stop McCain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies ]


To: redgirlinabluestate

A FENCE on the southern border is what I demand and nobody will deliver it.


324 posted on 02/15/2008 7:13:15 PM PST by floriduh voter (FL Gov. Crist "This is America. I can wear whatever I want. I believe in freedom." You go, girl.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson