I appreciate your point and it is wise advice. My point to Keith_Brown is there is a significant difference with women who begat children in a marriage and a woman who begat a child because they wanted one, like buying a dog.
With any divorcee’ one needs to evaluate the circumstance of the previous marriage. Those children do not qualify as bastards.
With a woman who has a child and no marriage, one needs to see how that child came into existence. One is she got pregnant by “accident” as it were and decided to keep the child, or whether, like the writer of this column intended to get pregnant and remain a single woman.
In either case accidental or willful, such women are problematic, with the latter being downright dangerous to the men she is looking to ensnare into a marriage of convenience(for her) and servitude(to her). When the adoption process is complete and she now has a child support source, her mission is finished and said man is dispatched and his wages garnished to pay child support.
>>there is a significant difference with women who begat children in a marriage and a woman who begat a child because they wanted one, like buying a dog.
Very true. The writer of the article seems like someone to avoid at all costs. But in both cases, the selfishness was there, it is just that the writer’s is more apparent.
I feel very bad for my second cousins. They had to deal with a physically abusive biological father, then were lucky enough to be raised in a stable home, only to see their moms cast off that stability once they were in the military or off to college.