Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cases filed in the Minnesota District Court (Sinclair vs. Obama)
Justia.com ^ | staff

Posted on 02/13/2008 5:15:21 PM PST by pissant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last
To: freedomwarrior998

I don’t care if Hillary’s team found this guy and paid him. I only care if it is true. The empty commie suit needs to be shoved back under the rock from which he crawled out of.


21 posted on 02/13/2008 5:48:40 PM PST by pissant (Time for a CONSERVATIVE party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NeonKnight
You really can't read. I never "blamed" McCain. I said that McCain can beat Obama on his own without resorting to Hillary!ite dirty tricks.

That's a fact.

I don't believe McCain would ever be dishonorable enough to try a smear like this.

Hillary! would. Ron Paul Would.

Apparently you are as well.

22 posted on 02/13/2008 5:51:37 PM PST by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NeonKnight
You really can't read. I never "blamed" McCain. I said that McCain can beat Obama on his own without resorting to Hillary!ite dirty tricks.

That's a fact.

I don't believe McCain would ever be dishonorable enough to try a smear like this.

Hillary! would. Ron Paul Would.

Apparently you are as well.

23 posted on 02/13/2008 5:52:38 PM PST by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NeonKnight

Sorry, that was meant for pissant, not you.


24 posted on 02/13/2008 5:53:27 PM PST by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: pissant

You really can’t read. I never “blamed” McCain. I said that McCain can beat Obama on his own without resorting to Hillary!ite dirty tricks.

That’s a fact.

I don’t believe McCain would ever be dishonorable enough to try a smear like this.

Hillary! would. Ron Paul Would.

Apparently you are as well.
23 posted on 02/13/2008 5:52:38 PM PST b


25 posted on 02/13/2008 5:54:01 PM PST by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998

It is only dishonorable if it is untrue. Just like Bill Clinton, Obama is a narcissist and a liar. I tend to side with the accuser. Kinda like Juanita Broderick, I’d say.


26 posted on 02/13/2008 5:54:53 PM PST by pissant (Time for a CONSERVATIVE party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: pissant
c) You don’t file a federal lawsuit for civil rights violations for Obama’s camp ignoring you. They apparently are doing bimbo eruption control on him.

What you are implying is that Obama is guilty until proven innocent. I don't care which side someone is on, it is not the view of our justice system that one has to prove one's innocence to every claim made. And if this case goes the distance then of course the burden is on the plaintiff and the government to prove Obama's guilt.

I'll reserve further comment until I see what "civil rights" have supposedly been violated.

27 posted on 02/13/2008 5:56:53 PM PST by torchthemummy ("Patriotism is looking out for yourself by looking out for your Country"-Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: pissant
ArchieBunker

This couldn't possibly hurt Obama! This is a badge of honor for a liberal Democrat.

28 posted on 02/13/2008 5:56:55 PM PST by missnry (The truth will set you free ... and drive liberals Crazy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: torchthemummy

I’m not asking anyone to proclaim Obama “guilty” of anything. If you think the MSM would be this silent if he was accusing Cheney of doing this, I have a bridge to sell you. This is a huge story. Someone will break it open.


29 posted on 02/13/2008 5:58:55 PM PST by pissant (Time for a CONSERVATIVE party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: missnry

The crack cocain part maybe. The BJ will not go over well except in large metropolitan areas with large poofer populations.


30 posted on 02/13/2008 6:00:58 PM PST by pissant (Time for a CONSERVATIVE party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: pissant
If you think the MSM would be this silent if he was accusing Cheney of doing this, I have a bridge to sell you.

While I agree that there is an unquestionable double standard, the standard should be when a there is...there. That is a solid case. I don't know of any. I only know the claims being made for a while and now this guy has gone the federal legal route.

Bottomline is that I believe we conservatives should embrace the standards we would want applied to us. The dishonesty of the press and their culture of double standards that shields the liberals should be shown for what it is but claims like this shouldn't be embraced because we lick our chops at the as of yet unproved allegation's potential.

31 posted on 02/13/2008 6:11:37 PM PST by torchthemummy ("Patriotism is looking out for yourself by looking out for your Country"-Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I wonder if the accuser saved the dress hummmm I mean pants.


32 posted on 02/13/2008 6:18:06 PM PST by Orange1998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: torchthemummy

I freely admit it is unproven. And I freely admit I hope it is true. Because I freely admit I can’t stand socialists, especially empty suited ones within striking distance of the presidency.


33 posted on 02/13/2008 6:23:26 PM PST by pissant (Time for a CONSERVATIVE party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Orange1998

LOL.


34 posted on 02/13/2008 6:24:47 PM PST by pissant (Time for a CONSERVATIVE party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: NeonKnight

He’s not afraid, this sinclair guy. He even went onto Democrats.org and started fighting with them boys...

By Democrat in Laredo, TX Feb 10th 2008 at 10:46 pm EST

You need to get your facts straight, something you nor anyone else here seems to be able to do.

All of you post my videos and statements all over the web and then come back and say I post somewhere. You people are getting ridiculous and so intent on distorting everything that I do not think you know what the truth of anything is.

You sit here and post lie after lie and then have the nerve to call me a liar.

Thank God for the ability to track IP addresses. God you people are going to make all of us Dems look like fools compared to the Republicans when this is all said and done.

Its a sad day when you say you are a Dem and in the same breath try to bury another Dem for exposing a liar.

http://www.democrats.org/page/community/post/Mondo/CtTH


35 posted on 02/13/2008 6:33:07 PM PST by pissant (Time for a CONSERVATIVE party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TinaJeannes

Over here...


36 posted on 02/13/2008 6:34:14 PM PST by pissant (Time for a CONSERVATIVE party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
I freely admit it is unproven. And I freely admit I hope it is true. Because I freely admit I can’t stand socialists, especially empty suited ones within striking distance of the presidency.

Ditto. But the way I see it we have two choices: Billary wins the nomination and makes Obama VP or Billary is eliminated and she is not made VP. While it's possible that Hillary would accept a VP spot I doubt it. So eliminating her via her own party is optimal in the short and long run. Obama will be a tougher fight photogenically but the reality of his record and his proposals will turn alot of people off in the end.

All I know is Hillary is on the ropes and for her to fall would be a double bonus because Bill would fall down too.

37 posted on 02/13/2008 6:39:34 PM PST by torchthemummy ("Patriotism is looking out for yourself by looking out for your Country"-Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: pissant

My first question would be: who’s paying his legal costs?


38 posted on 02/13/2008 6:45:38 PM PST by M. Dodge Thomas (Opinion based on research by an eyewear firm, which surveyed 100 members of a speed dating club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Whoa. That looks honest.


39 posted on 02/13/2008 6:48:37 PM PST by bannie (clintons CHEAT! AAAALLWAYS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mbraynard

Also, it is too soon. I might even swallow my sword and vote for McInsane, if I knew he could win. Right now, there is no hope.


40 posted on 02/13/2008 6:50:00 PM PST by Harrius Magnus (Pucker up Mo, and your dhimmi Leftist freaks, here comes your Jizya!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson