Just a little rabble rousing on my part.
I'll post daily values from the above link.
Today's values are:
Flux Density Values in sfu for 22:00 on 2008:02:12
Julian Day Number : 2454509.406
Carrington Rotation Number : 2066.683
Observed Flux Density : 0072.2
Flux Density Adjusted for 1 A.U. : 0070.4
URSI Series D Flux, Adj. x 0.9 : 0063.4
As you can see, it still isn't going up.
If anyone else has other juicy links or comments to demonstrate how super serial our situation is, or even just pictures of Manbearpig, please chime in. .^
BTW ... all fun aside, global cooling is BAD.
1 posted on
02/13/2008 7:53:37 AM PST by
Rurudyne
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 last
To: Rurudyne
The Sun on Vacation: Day 76 of the Gore-Hansen Minimum
Dated from January 4th, 2008, with confirmation of sunspot #10,981.
Thursday Update
Flux Density Values in sfu for 17:00 on 2008:03:20
Julian Day Number : 2454546.197
Carrington Rotation Number : 2068.032
Observed Flux Density : 0068.9
Flux Density Adjusted for 1 A.U. : 0068.4
URSI Series D Flux, Adj. x 0.9 : 0061.5
148 posted on
03/20/2008 10:47:50 AM PDT by
Rurudyne
(Standup Philosopher)
To: Rurudyne
"Typically as you go through the ten or eleven year solar activity cycle you see the numbers go up or down. The lowest number is 64 or 68. The numbers 71 or 72 are very low, but they usually start to go up. We are at the end of a cycle, but the numbers still haven't gone up. We have been joking around coffee that we may be seeing the Sun about to shut down."
The Maunder Minimum pertains to sunspots, and when the sunspot numbers fall to near-zero, it gets cold on Earth. :') Thanks Rurudyne.
152 posted on
03/22/2008 9:23:09 AM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/______________________Profile updated Saturday, March 1, 2008)
To: Rurudyne
We have been joking around coffee that we may be seeing the Sun about to shut down.What a comedian. Great sense of humor!
191 posted on
04/06/2008 5:51:46 PM PDT by
Jim Noble
(I've got a home in Glory Land that outshines the sun)
To: Rurudyne; newgeezer
Why would we measure the sun’s total emr output based on flux density rather than an integrated measurement of the actual emr?
200 posted on
04/11/2008 11:20:53 AM PDT by
DungeonMaster
(WELL I SPEAK LOUD, AND I CARRY A BIGGER STICK, AND I USE IT TOO!)
To: Rurudyne
As you can see, it still isn't going up. On the good side, low-flying satellites will last longer, because there's less drag: they don't have to expend as much propellant to maintain altitude.
202 posted on
04/11/2008 11:37:37 AM PDT by
r9etb
To: Rurudyne
I read this a few months ago from a different source. The difference between the two was that the other source is saying that they are concerned that the Sun has not done this since the Little Ice Age. (Where they get data from then is a mystery to me.) But they believe this to be quite prolonged and will cause Worldwide crop failures and excessively long and cold Winters, with cold and wet Summers.
But in a way, I hope so. This would quell the GoreBull Warming fanatics and the Reverend Gore will be looking for a new audience who he can B.S.
238 posted on
04/28/2008 12:22:47 PM PDT by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(Juan McCain....The lesser of Three Liberals.")
To: Rurudyne
it’s supposed to be 95 degrees F in NYC (in the middle of July) today. What more proof do you need?
373 posted on
07/19/2008 3:25:51 AM PDT by
the invisib1e hand
(bweed'n dee boo bow shaaaboood'n dee feee-oooo!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson