Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russian overflight of US warship 'benign': US Navy chief
AFP ^ | 02/12/08

Posted on 02/12/2008 6:59:18 PM PST by Ivan the Terrible

WASHINGTON (AFP) — The chief of the US Navy said Tuesday an overflight of a US aircraft carrier by a Russian bomber off Japan was "benign" and unprovocative, adding that US crew were not called to combat stations.

Admiral Gary Roughead said he had not asked Moscow for an explanation, but offered one of his own: the Russian military is trying to re-emerge as a global force.

"But I did not consider it to be provocative," he said of Saturday's overflight of the USS Nimitz in the western Pacific.

"And, again, the way that our forces responded, our commanders responded, the performance of our systems was exactly what we expected," he added.

One of the bombers overflew the Nimitz at an altitude of 2,000 feet (600 meters), he told reporters at the Pentagon.

Roughead acknowledged that even during the Cold War US forces rarely overflew Russian warships.

But he said the flight of two TU-95 Bear bombers was detected early and alert aircraft were launched in a timely manner.

"The fact that we had such early detection, that we were able to launch our alerts in a very timely way, and when our airplanes joined up on the bombers, it was a very benign flight that came through, and we just latched onto them and followed them on in," he said.

"You know, it's not prudent to fly over an aircraft carrier," he said at another point. "But our situational awareness is such that, as I said, we had good detection, followed them in, and, in my mind, it's not something to go to general quarters over."

Roughead said the incident did not cause the Nimitz to go to general quarters -- a call for a ship's crew to combat stations.

US defense officials said four F-18 fighters intercepted the Russian bombers and escorted them until they had left the area.

Two other TU-95 bombers were intercepted earlier the same day by Japanese F-15 fighters.

Japan issued what it said was a strong protest with Moscow, which denied that its aircraft had ventured into Japanese airspace.

US Defense Secretary Robert Gates met the day after the Nimitz incident with Russian Deputy Premier Sergei Ivanov in Munich, Germany, but did not raise it in their talks, Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said.

"Any expressions of concern will probably be carried out through military-to-military quote 'diplomatic channels,'" State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said.

But the State Department did not "at this point intend to do anything on behalf of the Department of Defense," McCormack said.

The Russians have decided to resume "some of their long-range aviation flights" using material left over from the Cold War and were keeping "them in good, working order," he said

"But beyond that, I don't think we view it as a particular threat. It is something that we watch, it is something that we watch closely," he said.

Some members of Congress raised concerns about the incident, however, at a hearing with senior Pentagon officials.

Democratic Senator Bill Nelson said it "sounds pretty provocative to me ... that they would be flying over one of our aircraft carrier battle groups and specifically if it were the aircraft carrier itself."

Republican Senator Pete Domenici said Russia was using a flood of oil revenues to re-equip its military forces and re-establish military laboratories.

"And they're pretty modern in terms of what they're building, compared to what we thought over the last decade. And nobody ought to be fooled. They're not built just to be parked up there in the ice lands," he said.

General James Cartwright, the vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said that the overflight was unusual, "but not significant in that the practice was done safely, professionally and they were escorted out of the area."

"Now what we're concerned about is, what are the indications of this return to a Cold War mindset -- what are the implications of that activity and how do we best address that?

"We're just trying to now go back and look what message was intended by this overflight," he said.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Russia
KEYWORDS: russianmilitary; usn; ussnimitz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

1 posted on 02/12/2008 6:59:19 PM PST by Ivan the Terrible
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ivan the Terrible
"Admiral Gary Roughead said he had not asked Moscow for an explanation, but offered one of his own: the Russian military is trying to re-emerge as a global force."

Why can't these guys just say "no comment"?

2 posted on 02/12/2008 7:00:50 PM PST by Brian S. Fitzgerald ("We're going to drag that ship over the mountain.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ivan the Terrible; Jeff Head
"But I did not consider it to be provocative," he said of Saturday's overflight of the USS Nimitz in the western Pacific.

Roughhead and the rest of CINCPAC can't possibly believe this...?

3 posted on 02/12/2008 7:03:42 PM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner ("We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!"--Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ivan the Terrible

If he really believes this nonsense, he should resign tomorrow.


4 posted on 02/12/2008 7:05:29 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S. Fitzgerald
This was for Russian consumption.
5 posted on 02/12/2008 7:06:17 PM PST by ANGGAPO (LayteGulfBeachClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

I dunno, back in the day, this sort of thing went on all the dang time, by both sides. That’s the era Adm. Roughead came up in, and would be my guess as to why he doesn’t see anything all that odd about it.


6 posted on 02/12/2008 7:07:11 PM PST by squidly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ivan the Terrible
US Defense Secretary Robert Gates met the day after the Nimitz incident with Russian Deputy Premier Sergei Ivanov in Munich, Germany, but did not raise it in their talks, Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said.

No one knows what goes on behind closed doors.

7 posted on 02/12/2008 7:14:00 PM PST by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S. Fitzgerald

Darn right. Doing nothing and saying nothing may be the tactically intelligent thing to do, but making youself look stupid isn’t.


8 posted on 02/12/2008 7:15:43 PM PST by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: squidly

Shhhh...

Facts are just confusing.


9 posted on 02/12/2008 7:16:28 PM PST by SlapHappyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
If he really believes this nonsense, he should resign tomorrow.

Excellent advice, we'll appoint you as his successor since you have such an uncanny ability to be able to second guess his decision as well as your obvious insider info on exactly what occured that day.........

Nukem cicero!

10 posted on 02/12/2008 7:16:50 PM PST by Hot Tabasco ( Don’t go messing with Smokey Taylor. He just bought a whole bunch of fresh ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dr_who_2

It’s a game,Russia doesn’t want Hillary or boma as president. A threat by Russia will wake up the sheeple.


11 posted on 02/12/2008 7:18:36 PM PST by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ivan the Terrible

I may be wrong but isn’t the actual name of the ship, the USS Chester W. Nimitz? No one ever says the full name of this one ship, but everyone does for all of the other ships of that class.


12 posted on 02/12/2008 7:19:17 PM PST by quikdrw (Life is tough....it's even tougher if you are stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ANGGAPO

I would hate for a missile to accidently be launched.


13 posted on 02/12/2008 7:19:44 PM PST by Holicheese (1-21-09 Hillary starts to destroy America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ivan the Terrible

Just promise that the next such flights that happen will be terminated with “extreme prejudice”, and all this crap will end.

As the “woosy” country we are becoming, we will do nothing until it is too late.

TU-95 is a large and relatively slow, easy target, so electronically noisy it can be detected about 100 feet off the runway, so we know when it is coming long before it would be a threat.

The Russians know we will do nothing but postulate, so they feel free to play with us.


14 posted on 02/12/2008 7:20:22 PM PST by doc1019
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S. Fitzgerald

Admiral Roughead can now expect the Russians, Iranians, and Chinese to harass Navy ships in every way imaginable. After that happens enough times, some “stateless” terrorist outfit will launch well-planned attacks on Navy ships using the knowledge gleaned by our buddies in Russia, China, and Iran.


15 posted on 02/12/2008 7:23:23 PM PST by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ivan the Terrible
"...it was a very benign flight that came through"

This time....

.

16 posted on 02/12/2008 7:23:48 PM PST by Iron Munro (Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress; but I repeat myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quikdrw
The ship's official website doesn't say anything about Chester W.
17 posted on 02/12/2008 7:24:06 PM PST by squidly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BARLF

Wishful thinking. It is a game, but that doesn’t mean we should play along.


18 posted on 02/12/2008 7:24:51 PM PST by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: squidly
I dunno, back in the day, this sort of thing went on all the dang time, by both sides.

This pales by comparison to the stories I heard about U.S. boomers and Russian subs in the Med.

At least these guys didn't play long enough to draw Mickey Mouse on the navigational plotter.

19 posted on 02/12/2008 7:25:04 PM PST by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Holicheese

Yea, me to. ;-)


20 posted on 02/12/2008 7:25:23 PM PST by doc1019
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson